309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11285420)
21. Facet Joint Fixation and Anterior, Direct Lateral, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Diseases: Retrospective Cohort Study of a New Minimally Invasive Technique.
Belykh E; Kalinin AA; Martirosyan NL; Kerimbayev T; Theodore N; Preul MC; Byvaltsev VA
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e959-e968. PubMed ID: 29588241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes.
Crandall DG; Revella J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):2126-33. PubMed ID: 19752698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does Day of Surgery Affect Hospital Length of Stay and Charges Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
Hijji FY; Narain AS; Haws BE; Khechen B; Kudaravalli KT; Yom KH; Singh K
Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Jun; 31(5):E291-E295. PubMed ID: 29608450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Direct Versus Indirect Decompression with Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Matched-Pair Comparison Analysis.
Lin GX; Akbary K; Kotheeranurak V; Quillo-Olvera J; Jo HJ; Yang XW; Mahatthanatrakul A; Kim JS
World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e898-e909. PubMed ID: 30099187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Outcomes of Anterior, Posterior, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery at a Single Lumbar Level with Degenerative Spinal Disease.
Lee N; Kim KN; Yi S; Ha Y; Shin DA; Yoon DH; Kim KS
World Neurosurg; 2017 May; 101():216-226. PubMed ID: 28189865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cost-utility of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: systematic review and economic evaluation.
Phan K; Hogan JA; Mobbs RJ
Eur Spine J; 2015 Nov; 24(11):2503-13. PubMed ID: 26195079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of peri-operative and 12-month lifestyle outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional lumbar fusion.
Virdee JS; Nadig A; Anagnostopoulos G; George KJ
Br J Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 31(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 27331649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Variability and contributions to cost associated with anterior versus posterior approaches to lumbar interbody fusion.
Crawford AM; Lightsey HM; Xiong GX; Striano BM; Pisano AJ; Schoenfeld AJ; Simpson AK
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Jul; 206():106688. PubMed ID: 34015696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Pelton M; Singh K
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Correction of severe spinopelvic mismatch: decreased blood loss with lateral hyperlordotic interbody grafts as compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
Leveque JC; Yanamadala V; Buchlak QD; Sethi RK
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E15. PubMed ID: 28760028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Stability of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the setting of retained facets and posterior fixation using transfacet or standard pedicle screws.
Chin KR; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Neagoe A; Gabriel JP; Sung RD; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 24210638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Lateral interbody fusion combined with open posterior surgery for adult spinal deformity.
Strom RG; Bae J; Mizutani J; Valone F; Ames CP; Deviren V
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):697-705. PubMed ID: 27341052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis of Cost and 30-Day Outcomes in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Less Invasive, Stand-Alone Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion.
Hartman C; Hemphill C; Godzik J; Walker CT; Wewel JT; Turner JD; Uribe JS
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e1037-e1040. PubMed ID: 30414525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Ploumis A; Wu C; Fischer G; Mehbod AA; Wu W; Faundez A; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Lumbar spinal fusion versus anterior lumbar disc replacement: the financial implications.
Patel VV; Estes S; Lindley EM; Burger E
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Oct; 21(7):473-6. PubMed ID: 18836357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
