BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11285420)

  • 41. [Effects of oblique lateral interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lordosis correction in degenerative lumbar diseases].
    Chen YL; Zhu ZH; Wang YK; Fan SW; Fang XQ; Wan SL; Zhang JF; Zhao X; Zhao FD
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 98(25):1990-1995. PubMed ID: 29996598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical and radiological outcome of anterior-posterior fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective comparative study of 133 patients.
    Faundez AA; Schwender JD; Safriel Y; Gilbert TJ; Mehbod AA; Denis F; Transfeldt EE; Wroblewski JM
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Feb; 18(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 19125304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in the elderly: a 10-year experience.
    Agarwal N; Faramand A; Alan N; Tempel ZJ; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 29(5):525-529. PubMed ID: 30052150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Salvage procedures for pseudarthrosis after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)-anterior-only versus anterior-posterior surgery: a clinical and radiological outcome study.
    Vargas-Soto HA; Mehbod A; Mullaney KJ; Dykes D; Schwender J; Transfeldt E; Akesen B; Wroblewski J
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2009; 18(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 19995500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability.
    Villavicencio AT; Burneikiene S; Bulsara KR; Thramann JJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 16760781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Benefit of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion vs Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Spine Disorders: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From the National Neurosurgical Quality and Outcomes Database Registry.
    Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Ghogawala Z; Foley KT; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
    Neurosurgery; 2016 Sep; 79(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 26579968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Long-term outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative scoliosis.
    Kurra S; Lavelle WF; Silverstein MP; Savage JW; Orr RD
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1014-1021. PubMed ID: 29174460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Navigation Makes Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Less Invasive.
    Wang Y; Hu Y; Liu H; Li C; Li H; Yi X
    Orthopedics; 2016 Sep; 39(5):e857-62. PubMed ID: 27248336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion in long deformity constructs: a matched cohort analysis.
    Dorward IG; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; OʼLeary PT; Stoker GE; Pahys JM; Kang MM; Sides BA; Koester LA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E755-62. PubMed ID: 23442780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Yu AL; Gruskay JA; Delasotta LA; Radcliff KE; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Vaccaro AR
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 23218509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparing miniopen and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion in single-level lumbar degeneration.
    Lo WL; Lin CM; Yeh YS; Su YK; Tseng YY; Yang ST; Lin JW
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():168384. PubMed ID: 25629037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Single-level lumbar spine fusion: a comparison of anterior and posterior approaches.
    Pradhan BB; Nassar JA; Delamarter RB; Wang JC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2002 Oct; 15(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 12394658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2 in spinal deformity, spondylolisthesis, and degenerative disease--part 1: Large series diagnosis related outcomes and complications with 2- to 9-year follow-up.
    Crandall DG; Revella J; Patterson J; Huish E; Chang M; McLemore R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):1128-36. PubMed ID: 23370679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of the Total and Hidden Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Open and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Zhang H; Chen ZX; Sun ZM; Jiang C; Ni WF; Lin Y; Wu YS
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Nov; 107():739-743. PubMed ID: 28844914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study.
    Li L; Liu Y; Zhang P; Lei T; Li J; Shen Y
    J Int Med Res; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1424-1429. PubMed ID: 27811052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.
    Patel AA; Zfass-Mendez M; Lebwohl NH; Wang MY; Green BA; Levi AD; Vanni S; Williams SK
    Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():130-4. PubMed ID: 26361455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of three different posterior fixation techniques in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for two-level lumbar degenerative diseases: At a mean follow up time of 46 months.
    Liu F; Cao Y; Feng Z; Zhou X; Jiang C; Li X; Chen Z; Li Z; Liang Y; Jiang X; Dong J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Feb; 141():1-6. PubMed ID: 26691785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.