BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11285420)

  • 81. Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed at 1 and 2 levels.
    Ames CP; Acosta FL; Chi J; Iyengar J; Muiru W; Acaroglu E; Puttlitz CM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):E562-6. PubMed ID: 16205329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Exploratory meta-analysis on dose-related efficacy and morbidity of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal arthrodesis surgery.
    Hofstetter CP; Hofer AS; Levi AD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):457-75. PubMed ID: 26613283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Disk Disease and Spondylolisthesis Grade I: Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery.
    Brodano GB; Martikos K; Lolli F; Gasbarrini A; Cioni A; Bandiera S; Silvestre MD; Boriani S; Greggi T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Dec; 28(10):E559-64. PubMed ID: 24136060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine.
    Fan W; Guo LX
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):490-498. PubMed ID: 30714396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. A Biomechanical Stability Study of Extraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion on the Cadaveric Lumbar Spine Specimens.
    Guo S; Zeng C; Yan M; Han Y; Xia D; Sun G; Li L; Yang M; Tan J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168498. PubMed ID: 28005935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Learning curve of a complex surgical technique: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).
    Lee KH; Yeo W; Soeharno H; Yue WM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):E234-40. PubMed ID: 24513660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Jiang SD; Chen JW; Jiang LS
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Sep; 132(9):1259-66. PubMed ID: 22622795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. [Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].
    Wen J; Yang Y; Zhang H; Liu L; Liu YL; Liu Y; Wang D; Wang ZP
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Mar; 32(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30921999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.
    Macki M; Bydon M; Weingart R; Sciubba D; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Witham T
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 138():117-23. PubMed ID: 26318363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 3: assessment of economic outcome.
    Ghogawala Z; Whitmore RG; Watters WC; Sharan A; Mummaneni PV; Dailey AT; Choudhri TF; Eck JC; Groff MW; Wang JC; Resnick DK; Dhall SS; Kaiser MG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 24980580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Incidence of and risk factors for superior facet violation in minimally invasive versus open pedicle screw placement during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis.
    Lau D; Terman SW; Patel R; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 23394166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Clinical outcomes following spinal fusion using an intraoperative computed tomographic 3D imaging system.
    Xiao R; Miller JA; Sabharwal NC; Lubelski D; Alentado VJ; Healy AT; Mroz TE; Benzel EC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May; 26(5):628-637. PubMed ID: 28291408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. A Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions: Complications, Readmissions, Discharge Dispositions, and Costs.
    Qureshi R; Puvanesarajah V; Jain A; Shimer AL; Shen FH; Hassanzadeh H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):1865-1870. PubMed ID: 28549000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. The Impact of Comorbidity Burden on Complications, Length of Stay, and Direct Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Bawa MS; Patel DV; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Lalehzarian SP; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(5):363-368. PubMed ID: 30095793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Total and hidden blood loss between open posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by Wiltse approach.
    Lei F; Li Z; He W; Tian X; Zheng L; Kang J; Feng D
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 May; 99(20):e19864. PubMed ID: 32443290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Single-level Posterolateral Fusion (PLF) Alone and Posterior Interbody Fusion (PLIF/TLIF) Alone Lead to a Decreased Risk of Short-term Complications Compared to Combined PLF With PLIF/TLIF Procedures: A Matched Analysis.
    Plantz MA; Hsu WK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(21):E1391-E1399. PubMed ID: 32796465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Posterior stabilization with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with titanium rods for single-level lumbar spine degenerative disease in patients above 70 years of age.
    Kamenova M; Li E; Soleman J; Fiebig O; Mehrkens A; Schaeren S
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jun; 143(6):2831-2843. PubMed ID: 35511354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors.
    Hee HT; Castro FP; Majd ME; Holt RT; Myers L
    J Spinal Disord; 2001 Dec; 14(6):533-40. PubMed ID: 11723406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Index episode-of-care propensity-matched comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) techniques: open traditional TLIF versus midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF) versus robot-assisted MIDLIF.
    Ver MLP; Gum JL; Crawford CH; Djurasovic M; Owens RK; Brown M; Steele P; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 Jan; 32(5):741-747. PubMed ID: 31978884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Posterior/Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Propensity Score-Weighted Study.
    Masuda S; Fukasawa T; Takeuchi M; Fujibayashi S; Otsuki B; Murata K; Shimizu T; Matsuda S; Kawakami K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Jul; 48(13):901-907. PubMed ID: 36716385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.