These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. U.S. science policy. Report tells NSF to think more boldly. Mervis J Science; 2007 Mar; 315(5817):1352-3. PubMed ID: 17347421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. National Science Foundation. Digging for fresh ideas in the sandpit. Mervis J Science; 2009 May; 324(5931):1128-9. PubMed ID: 19478152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. science policy. Bill would set new rules for choosing NSF grants. Mervis J Science; 2013 May; 340(6132):534. PubMed ID: 23641083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Looking to NSF as an NIH model. Yost WA Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6046):1093. PubMed ID: 21868657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A turn-up for the National Science Foundation. Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):253. PubMed ID: 12447401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Review process for the Department of Defense: breast cancer research funds. Sleven M J Oncol Manag; 1999; 8(6):17-8. PubMed ID: 11184266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research priorities: new program at NSF reflects shift in values. Greenberg DS Science; 1970 Oct; 170(3954):144-6. PubMed ID: 5456609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolution and growth at NSF. Abelson PH Science; 1987 May; 236(4804):893. PubMed ID: 3576204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. NSF. Change of direction afoot. Beardsley T Nature; 1985 Sep 5-11; 317(6032):3. PubMed ID: 4033787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Money for NSF: the odyssey of a research agency's budget. Greenberg DS Science; 1967 Oct; 158(3799):357-61. PubMed ID: 6061884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Gain for space station; pain for NSF. Marshall E Science; 1992 Aug; 257(5071):737. PubMed ID: 1496386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]