253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11287170)
1. Mini mutagenicity test: a miniaturized version of the Ames test used in a prescreening assay for point mutagenesis assessment.
Flamand N; Meunier J; Meunier P; Agapakis-Caussé C
Toxicol In Vitro; 2001 Apr; 15(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 11287170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mutagenicity evaluation of pesticide analogs using standard and 6-well miniaturized bacterial reverse mutation tests.
Egorova OV; Ilyushina NA; Rakitskii VN
Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Dec; 69():105006. PubMed ID: 32976929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacterial mutagenicity assays: Vehicle and positive control results from the standard Ames assay, the 6- and 24-well miniaturized plate incorporation assays and the Ames II™ assay.
Pant K; Bruce S; Sly J; Klug Laforce M; Springer S; Cecil M; Andrus E; Dakoulas E; Wagner VO; Hewitt NJ; Kulkarni R
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2016 Jul; 57(6):483-96. PubMed ID: 27198925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The micro-Ames test: A direct comparison of the performance and sensitivities of the standard and 24-well plate versions of the bacterial mutation test.
Proudlock R; Evans K
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2016 Dec; 57(9):687-705. PubMed ID: 27862311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mutagenicity Evaluation of Nanoparticles by the Ames Assay.
Pan X
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2326():275-285. PubMed ID: 34097276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A perspective on the development of the Ames Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity assay.
Mortelmans K
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2019 May; 841():14-16. PubMed ID: 31138405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Methods used in evaluating mutagenic and genotoxic properties of chemical compounds. II. The Ames test (an abridged version)].
Janik-Spiechowicz E
Med Pr; 1989; 40(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 2666814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of 24 chemicals in the six-well bacterial reverse mutation assay to the standard 100-mm Petri plate bacterial reverse mutation assay in two laboratories.
Nicolette J; Dakoulas E; Pant K; Crosby M; Kondratiuk A; Murray J; Sonders P; Kulkarni R; Jayakumar G; Mathur M; Patel A; Vicente R; Datta K; Kolaja K
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Dec; 100():134-160. PubMed ID: 30401633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the performance of the Ames MPF™ assay: A multicenter collaborative study with six coded chemicals.
Spiliotopoulos D; Koelbert C; Audebert M; Barisch I; Bellet D; Constans M; Czich A; Finot F; Gervais V; Khoury L; Kirchnawy C; Kitamoto S; Le Tesson A; Malesic L; Matsuyama R; Mayrhofer E; Mouche I; Preikschat B; Prielinger L; Rainer B; Roblin C; Wäse K
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2024 Jan; 893():503718. PubMed ID: 38272629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of the detecting mutagenic effect of two short microbiological tests].
Li YH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1992 Nov; 13(6):419-22. PubMed ID: 1576907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The dosing determines mutagenicity of hydrophobic compounds in the Ames II assay with metabolic transformation: passive dosing versus solvent spiking.
Smith KE; Heringa MB; Uytewaal M; Mayer P
Mutat Res; 2013 Jan; 750(1-2):12-8. PubMed ID: 22989744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay.
Mortelmans K; Zeiger E
Mutat Res; 2000 Nov; 455(1-2):29-60. PubMed ID: 11113466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a toxicity test to be coupled to the Ames Salmonella assay and the method of constriction of the required strains.
Waleh NS; Rapport SJ; Mortelmans K
Mutat Res; 1982 Aug; 97(4):247-56. PubMed ID: 6750389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the results of a modified miniscreen and the standard bacterial reverse mutation assays.
Diehl MS; Willaby SL; Snyder RD
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2000; 36(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 10918362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A miniaturized Ames mutagenicity assay employing bioluminescent strains of Salmonella typhimurium.
Côté C; Blaise C; Delisle CE; Meighen EA; Hansen PD
Mutat Res; 1995 Dec; 345(3-4):137-46. PubMed ID: 8552135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The Ames test as a criterion in hygienic studies of the mutagenic effect of metals].
D'iachenko OZ; Saĭchenko SP; Nadeenko VG; Sharapova NE
Gig Sanit; 1990 Aug; (8):83-5. PubMed ID: 2283079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct comparison of the Ames microplate format (MPF) test in liquid medium with the standard Ames pre-incubation assay on agar plates by use of equivocal to weakly positive test compounds.
Flückiger-Isler S; Kamber M
Mutat Res; 2012 Aug; 747(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 22579797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of amount and type of agar on the number of spontaneous revertants in the Ames test.
de Raat WK; Willems MI; de Meijere FA
Mutat Res; 1984 Jul; 137(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 6379436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Miniaturization of the microsuspension Salmonella/microsome assay in agar microplates.
Zwarg JRRM; Morales DA; Maselli BS; Brack W; Umbuzeiro GA
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2018 Jul; 59(6):488-501. PubMed ID: 29668047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multiple in silico program approach for the prediction of mutagenicity from chemical structure.
White AC; Mueller RA; Gallavan RH; Aaron S; Wilson AG
Mutat Res; 2003 Aug; 539(1-2):77-89. PubMed ID: 12948816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
