These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11287919)

  • 1. A tortured tale of supply and demand.
    Downer J
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):624. PubMed ID: 11287919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. US scientific panels Bush-whacked.
    Novak K
    Nat Med; 2003 Feb; 9(2):153. PubMed ID: 12563322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Embryo and stem cell research in the United States: history and politics.
    Wertz DC
    Gene Ther; 2002 Jun; 9(11):674-8. PubMed ID: 12032685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Turn of the tide.
    Nat Med; 2004 Apr; 10(4):317. PubMed ID: 15057206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A false choice. Science should trump politics in the stem-cell debate.
    Borger G
    US News World Rep; 2001 Jul; 131(1):27. PubMed ID: 11447651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. U.S. Congress. Would cloning ban affect stem cells?
    Holden C
    Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5532):1025. PubMed ID: 11498550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Senators mull new ways to make stem cells.
    Regalado A
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 Jul; ():B1,B4. PubMed ID: 16134272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomedical policy. Bush squeezes between the lines on stem cells.
    Vogel G
    Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5533):1242-5. PubMed ID: 11509703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stem cells: why Bush's ban could be reversed.
    Tumulty K
    Time; 2005 May; 165(21):26-30. PubMed ID: 15926773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The ethics of control.
    Charo RA
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):109, 143-55. PubMed ID: 12664940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bush compromise raises doubts over stem-cell resilience.
    Knight J
    Nature; 2001 Aug; 412(6848):665. PubMed ID: 11507593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Balancing science, ethics and politics: stem cell research, a paradigm case.
    Pellegrino ED
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2002; 18(3):591-611. PubMed ID: 12491656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lies in embryo.
    Caplan A
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):15-6. PubMed ID: 16830437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stem cells and false hopes.
    Condic ML
    First Things; 2002; (125):21-2. PubMed ID: 12705234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Washington insider. The elections and Congress: a continued statement on embryo research?
    Doerflinger RM
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 15887337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biologists officially welcome plan.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2001 Aug; 412(6848):665. PubMed ID: 11507594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Bush got there.
    Lacayo R
    Time; 2001 Aug; 158(7):17-21, 23. PubMed ID: 11524869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stem cells in limbo.
    Lemonick MD
    Time; 2003 Aug; 162(6):51. PubMed ID: 14974198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stem cells: still here, still waiting.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2003 May; 300(5621):865. PubMed ID: 12738815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The great cell debate.
    Goldstein A
    Time; 2001 Jul; 158(3):24-5. PubMed ID: 11484322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.