These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11287953)

  • 1. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox.
    Kotiaho JS; Simmons LW; Tomkins JL
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):684-6. PubMed ID: 11287953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genic capture and the genetic basis of sexually selected traits in the zebra finch.
    Birkhead TR; Pellatt EJ; Matthews IM; Roddis NJ; Hunter FM; McPhie F; Castillo-Juarez H
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2389-98. PubMed ID: 17236429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus.
    Kotiaho JS; Simmons LW; Hunt J; Tomkins JL
    Am Nat; 2003 Jun; 161(6):852-9. PubMed ID: 12858271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No apparent indirect genetic benefits to female red flour beetles preferring males with intense copulatory courtship.
    Edvardsson M; Arnqvist G
    Behav Genet; 2006 Sep; 36(5):775-82. PubMed ID: 16557363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evolution of male genitalia: patterns of genetic variation and covariation in the genital sclerites of the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus.
    House CM; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1281-92. PubMed ID: 16135123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual selection: does condition dependence fail to resolve the 'lek paradox'?
    Cotton S; Pomiankowski A
    Curr Biol; 2007 May; 17(9):R335-7. PubMed ID: 17470350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the resolution of the lek paradox.
    Kotiaho JS; LeBas NR; Puurtinen M; Tomkins JL
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2008 Jan; 23(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18077055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Condition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song.
    Brandt LS; Greenfield MD
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Jul; 17(4):821-8. PubMed ID: 15271081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shorter sperm confer higher competitive fertilization success.
    García-González F; Simmons LW
    Evolution; 2007 Apr; 61(4):816-24. PubMed ID: 17439614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.
    Kokko H; Heubel K
    Genetica; 2008 Feb; 132(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17619173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No evidence for condition-dependent expression of male genitalia in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus.
    House CM; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jul; 20(4):1322-32. PubMed ID: 17584227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evolutionary reduction in testes size and competitive fertilization success in response to the experimental removal of sexual selection in dung beetles.
    Simmons LW; García-González F
    Evolution; 2008 Oct; 62(10):2580-91. PubMed ID: 18691259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postmating sexual selection favors males that sire offspring with low fitness.
    Bilde T; Foged A; Schilling N; Arnqvist G
    Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1705-6. PubMed ID: 19556506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Male and female secondary sexual traits show different patterns of quantitative genetic and environmental variation in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
    Watson NL; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Nov; 23(11):2397-402. PubMed ID: 20831732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The depletion of genetic variance by sexual selection.
    Van Homrigh A; Higgie M; McGuigan K; Blows MW
    Curr Biol; 2007 Mar; 17(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 17306541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evolution of repeated mating in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides.
    House CM; Evans GM; Smiseth PT; Stamper CE; Walling CA; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2008 Aug; 62(8):2004-14. PubMed ID: 18489722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
    Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.