These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11287953)
61. The maintenance of heritable variation through social competition. Harris WE; McKane AJ; Wolf JB Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):337-47. PubMed ID: 18031305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Reaction norm variants for male calling song in populations of Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): toward a resolution of the lek paradox. Zhou Y; Kuster HK; Pettis JS; Danka RG; Gleason JM; Greenfield MD Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1317-34. PubMed ID: 18346222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The genetic architecture of house fly mating behavior. Meffert LM; Hagenbuch KL Curr Top Dev Biol; 2005; 66():189-213. PubMed ID: 15797454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment. Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2218-25. PubMed ID: 17236415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Mutations and natural genetic variation in the courtship song of Drosophila. Gleason JM Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 15864442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual display trait in Drosophila serrata. Delcourt M; Rundle HD Am Nat; 2011 Jun; 177(6):812-23. PubMed ID: 21597257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Good genes and sexual selection in dung beetles (Onthophagus taurus): genetic variance in egg-to-adult and adult viability. Garcia-Gonzalez F; Simmons LW PLoS One; 2011 Jan; 6(1):e16233. PubMed ID: 21267411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. On the evolution of heightened condition dependence of male sexual displays. Gosden TP; Chenoweth SF J Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 24(3):685-92. PubMed ID: 21214657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Sexual selection can remove an experimentally induced mutation load. Almbro M; Simmons LW Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):295-300. PubMed ID: 24372608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Variation in acoustic signalling traits exhibits footprints of sexual selection. Reinhold K Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):738-45. PubMed ID: 20840596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The evolution of costly mate choice against segregation distorters. Manser A; Lindholm AK; Weissing FJ Evolution; 2017 Dec; 71(12):2817-2828. PubMed ID: 29071709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress. Bussière LF; Hunt J; Stölting KN; Jennions MD; Brooks R Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17987390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Multivariate quantitative genetics and the lek paradox: genetic variance in male sexually selected traits of Drosophila serrata under field conditions. Hine E; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW Evolution; 2004 Dec; 58(12):2754-62. PubMed ID: 15696753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Ontogenetic change in genetic variance in size depends on growth environment. Dmitriew C; Blows MW; Rowe L Am Nat; 2010 Jun; 175(6):640-9. PubMed ID: 20406061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Mitochondrial function and sexual selection: can physiology resolve the 'lek paradox'? Crino OL; Head ML; Jennions MD; Noble DWA J Exp Biol; 2024 Jan; 227(2):. PubMed ID: 38206324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]