These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11287953)

  • 81. Variation in the peacock's train shows a genetic component.
    Petrie M; Cotgreave P; Pike TW
    Genetica; 2009 Jan; 135(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 17922297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Fitness consequences of social network position in a wild population of forked fungus beetles (Bolitotherus cornutus).
    Formica VA; Wood CW; Larsen WB; Butterfield RE; Augat ME; Hougen HY; Brodie ED
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Jan; 25(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 22092581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. The capture of heritable variation for genetic quality through social competition.
    Wolf JB; Harris WE; Royle NJ
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 17924196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Bottleneck effects on genetic variance for courtship repertoire.
    Meffert LM
    Genetics; 1995 Jan; 139(1):365-74. PubMed ID: 7705637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits.
    Schluter D; Price T
    Proc Biol Sci; 1993 Jul; 253(1336):117-22. PubMed ID: 8396772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Quantitative genetics of breeding coloration in sand lizards; genic capture unlikely to maintain additive genetic variance.
    Lindsay WR; Bererhi B; Ljungström G; Wapstra E; Olsson M
    Heredity (Edinb); 2023 May; 130(5):329-334. PubMed ID: 36941410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Fruit resources shape sexual selection processes in a lek mating system.
    Anderson HL; Cabo J; Karubian J
    Biol Lett; 2024 Sep; 20(9):20240284. PubMed ID: 39319668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.
    Kokko H; Heubel K
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 18327650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. A Paradox of Genetic Variance in Epigamic Traits: Beyond "Good Genes" View of Sexual Selection.
    Radwan J; Engqvist L; Reinhold K
    Evol Biol; 2016; 43():267-275. PubMed ID: 27217597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Experimental evidence for effects of sexual selection on condition-dependent mutation rates.
    Baur J; Berger D
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2020 May; 4(5):737-744. PubMed ID: 32203473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. The genetics of maternal care: direct and indirect genetic effects on phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus.
    Hunt J; Simmons LW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 May; 99(10):6828-32. PubMed ID: 11983863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. The mother-in-law effect.
    Hunt J; Brooks R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Feb; 271 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S61-3. PubMed ID: 15101420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Schizophrenia as one extreme of a sexually selected fitness indicator.
    Shaner A; Miller G; Mintz J
    Schizophr Res; 2004 Sep; 70(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 15246469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Status-dependent selection in the dimorphic beetle Onthophagus taurus.
    Hunt J; Simmons LW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Dec; 268(1484):2409-14. PubMed ID: 11747558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Theories and observations on sexual selection and female choice in human beings.
    Perper T
    Med Anthropol; 1989 Jul; 11(4):409-54. PubMed ID: 2677584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. The effect of learning on the evolution of new courtship behavior: A simulation model.
    Morier-Genoud R; Kawecki TJ
    Curr Zool; 2015 Dec; 61(6):1062-1072. PubMed ID: 32256542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Condition dependence and the paradox of missing plasticity costs.
    De Lisle SP; Rowe L
    Evol Lett; 2023 Apr; 7(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 37033877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. The Darwin is in the details.
    Kenrick DT; Li N
    Am Psychol; 2000 Sep; 55(9):1060-1. PubMed ID: 11036711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Females aren't perfect: maintaining genetic variation and the lek paradox.
    Neff BD
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2000 Oct; 15(10):395. PubMed ID: 10998512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. What is 'the paradox of the lek'?
    Ritchie M
    Trends Ecol Evol; 1996 Apr; 11(4):175-6. PubMed ID: 21237796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.