These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1128897)
1. Peer review protection act does what title says. Pa Med; 1975 Jan; 78(1):17. PubMed ID: 1128897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review and protective laws in Pennsylvania. Gosfield AG; Gosfield GG Pa Med; 1979 Jun; 82(6):44-50. PubMed ID: 572526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What it is like to be involved as a peer in the Medical Practice Act. Curry LE J Med Assoc Ga; 1976 Jan; 65(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 1245804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Friedman v. Delaware County Memorial Hospital: judicial protection for good-faith peer review. Dalton JF Healthspan; 1988 Jan; 5(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 10286662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The evolving role of the American College of Surgeons in peer review and the PSRO legislation. Dunlop GR R I Med J; 1973 Aug; 56(8):329-32. PubMed ID: 4516956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Massive peer review program required by congress. J Okla State Med Assoc; 1973 Jan; 66(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 4687476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reporting peer review actions to the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners. Young MG Tex Med; 1989 Jan; 85(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 2922688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer group review, an educational experience. Skipper JK; Mulligan JL; Garg ML; McNamara MJ Ohio State Med J; 1974 Aug; 70(8):488-90. PubMed ID: 4858610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Connecticut's Peer Review Immunity Statute: a legislative history of P.A. 76-413. Brunell RJ Conn Med; 1979 Sep; 43(9):571-2, 575. PubMed ID: 519988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review: a legal update with a summary of state laws on immunity. Suber DG Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):651-66. PubMed ID: 7172669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review. Phillippi FM J Med Assoc State Ala; 1972 Sep; 42(3):151-2. PubMed ID: 5070861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The privilege of peer review. Overlock ME J Tenn Med Assoc; 1990 Nov; 83(11):563-5. PubMed ID: 2280592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Gearing up for peer review at the local level. Geriatrics; 1974 Jan; 29(1):136 passim. PubMed ID: 4586851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: what it means to medical specialty societies. Greeson TW; McClure DJ Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 10291133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protection of human research subjects: proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1979 Aug; 44(158):47687-729. PubMed ID: 10242808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer review is in the profession's best interest. White ER J Leg Med (N Y); 1974; 2(5):34-7. PubMed ID: 4548703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Data bank has operational impact. Proper peer review can protect hospitals from antitrust and defamation suits. Purtell DL Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):66-71. PubMed ID: 10107457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PSRO referendum to be conducted. J Okla State Med Assoc; 1973 Mar; 66(3):122-5. PubMed ID: 4734706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]