These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11289169)

  • 41. Are ratings of dentofacial attractiveness influenced by dentofacial midline discrepancies?
    Shyagali TR; Chandralekha B; Bhayya DP; Kumar S; Balasubramanyam G
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19113072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Layperson's preference regarding orientation of the transverse occlusal plane and commissure line from the frontal perspective.
    Silva BP; Jiménez-Castellanos E; Finkel S; Macias IR; Chu SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):513-516. PubMed ID: 27881322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Optimizing facial esthetics in the orthognathic surgery patient.
    O'Ryan F; Lassetter J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):702-15. PubMed ID: 21353931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Esthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling.
    Ritter DE; Gandini LG; Pinto Ados S; Locks A
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 16539542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The role of personality traits in self-rated oral health and preferences for different types of flawed smiles.
    Montero J; Gómez Polo C; Rosel E; Barrios R; Albaladejo A; López-Valverde A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Jan; 43(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 26333128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Solving the problems of maxillary asymmetry and the gummy smile.
    Fier MA
    Dent Today; 2004 Sep; 23(9):76, 78-81. PubMed ID: 15495449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Lip line preference for variant face types.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2012 Jun; 22(6):375-80. PubMed ID: 22630097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Three-dimensional evaluation of smile characteristics in subjects with increased vertical facial dimensions.
    Demir R; Baysal A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Jun; 157(6):773-782. PubMed ID: 32487307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A conservative approach to restoring a canted smile.
    Peck F
    Dent Today; 2010 Jun; 29(6):80, 82, 84-5. PubMed ID: 20565024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc.
    Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):98-111. PubMed ID: 11500650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics.
    Pinho S; Ciriaco C; Faber J; Lenza MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 18068592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The spontaneous smile in dynamic motion.
    Tarantili VV; Halazonetis DJ; Spyropoulos MN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 16027620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Excessive gingival display: treatment by a modified lip repositioning technique.
    Silva CO; Ribeiro-Júnior NV; Campos TV; Rodrigues JG; Tatakis DN
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Mar; 40(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 23278672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Rehabilitation of the paralyzed lower lip.
    Ellis DA; Miller RB
    J Otolaryngol; 1984 Dec; 13(6):403-5. PubMed ID: 6544857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The smile line as a guide to anterior esthetics.
    Miller CJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 1989 Apr; 33(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 2656315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Marginal mandibular nerve injury during neck dissection and its impact on patient perception of appearance.
    Batstone MD; Scott B; Lowe D; Rogers SN
    Head Neck; 2009 May; 31(5):673-8. PubMed ID: 19260116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Three-dimensional analysis of facial symmetry in cleft lip and palate patients using optical surface data.
    Stauber I; Vairaktaris E; Holst A; Schuster M; Hirschfelder U; Neukam FW; Nkenke E
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jul; 69(4):268-82. PubMed ID: 18797831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Analysis of esthetic smiles by using computer vision techniques.
    Wong NK; Kassim AA; Foong KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 16168340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The relationship of facial anatomic landmarks with midlines of the face and mouth.
    Bidra AS; Uribe F; Taylor TD; Agar JR; Rungruanganunt P; Neace WP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):94-103. PubMed ID: 19643223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The smile buccal corridors: aesthetic value for dentists and laypersons.
    Gracco A; Cozzani M; D'Elia L; Manfrini M; Peverada C; Siciliani G
    Prog Orthod; 2006; 7(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16552456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.