292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11289171)
41. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bite force in 2-mm locking plates versus 2-mm standard plates in treatment of mandibular fractures.
Agarwal M; Mohammad S; Singh RK; Singh V
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21272972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Evaluation of condylar neck fracture plating techniques.
Choi BH; Kim KN; Kim HJ; Kim MK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Apr; 27(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 10342148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Resorbable plates for the fixation of isolated mandibular angle fracture.
Yang RT; Lv K; Zhou HH; Li Z; Li ZB
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):447-8. PubMed ID: 25699528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Bite forces in patients treated for mandibular angle fractures: implications for fixation recommendations.
Tate GS; Ellis E; Throckmorton G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1994 Jul; 52(7):734-6. PubMed ID: 8006738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Fixation of mandibular angle fractures: in vitro biomechanical assessments and computer-based studies.
Chrcanovic BR
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 17(4):251-68. PubMed ID: 23064805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Experimental validation of finite element simulation of a new custom-designed fixation plate to treat mandibular angle fracture.
Xu X; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Fan YY; Wang JH; Wang R; Baur DA; Jiang XF; Dong XT
Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Feb; 20(1):15. PubMed ID: 33546713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Biomechanical comparison of a new technique of mandibular angle fractures: biplanar and bicortical superior proximal 3 holes and bicortical inferior plate fixation.
Turgut G; Kayali MU; Soydan AT; Gündüz O; Salman S; Oktar F; Baş L
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):428-32. PubMed ID: 18362721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [The value of an osteosynthesis arch-plate combination in the application zone in the treatment of fractures of the body of the mandible].
Gola R; Cheynet F; Carreau JP; Guyot L
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1996; 97(2):72-83. PubMed ID: 8685621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Resistance of four fixation techniques used to treat subcondylar fractures.
Cavalieri-Pereira L; Spagnol G; Sverzut CE; de Moraes M; Trivellato AE
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 22(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 29344821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Small and large titanium plates are equally effective for treating mandible fractures.
Bouloux GF; Chen S; Threadgill JM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1613-21. PubMed ID: 22698293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of Different Fixation Types Used in Unilateral Mandibular Condylar Fractures: An In Vivo Study With New Biomechanical Model.
Çimen E; Önder ME; Cambazoğlu M; Birant E
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 27(5):1277-81. PubMed ID: 27315307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Finite element analysis of three patterns of internal fixation of fractures of the mandibular condyle.
Aquilina P; Chamoli U; Parr WC; Clausen PD; Wroe S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 51(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 22981343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Osteosynthesis of subcondylar fractures using a rectangular 3-dimensional stabilization plate].
Wilk A; Biotchane I; Rosenstiel M; Charles X; Meyer C
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1997 Nov; 98 Suppl 1():40-4. PubMed ID: 9471693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Inion biodegradable plates: the first century.
Wood GD
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 44(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 16203066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Bite force evaluation of mandibular fractures treated with microplates and miniplates.
Gupta A; Singh V; Mohammad S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1903-8. PubMed ID: 22695018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Experimental and numerical approach to chosen types of mandibular fractures cured by means of miniplate osteosynthesis.
Kromka M; Milewski G
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2007; 9(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 18421943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Use of monocortical miniplates for the intraoral treatment of mandibular fractures.
Chiodo TA; Milles M
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2009 Mar; 17(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 19237124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Mechanical and photoelastic analysis of four different fixation methods for mandibular body fractures.
Rodrigues DC; Falci SG; Lauria A; Marchiori ÉC; Moreira RW
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 43(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 25596966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of in vitro resistance of titanium and resorbable (poly-L-DL-lactic acid) fixation systems on the mandibular angle fracture.
Bregagnolo LA; Bertelli PF; Ribeiro MC; Sverzut CE; Trivellato AE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):316-21. PubMed ID: 21067895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Invited review: small versus large plate fixation of mandibular fractures.
Alpert B; Engelstad M; Kushner GM
J Craniomaxillofac Trauma; 1999; 5(3):33-9; discussion 40. PubMed ID: 11951257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
