These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11291949)

  • 1. Impact of notch filter use on waveforms of First- and Second-Order-Kernel responses from multifocal ERGs.
    Bock M; Gerth C; Lorenz B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2000 Nov; 101(3):195-210. PubMed ID: 11291949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of a Digital Power Line Filter in the 2-Global-Flash Multifocal Electroretinogram of Glaucoma Patients Compared to Controls.
    Ledolter AA; Todorova MG; Schoetzau A; Palmowski-Wolfe AM
    Curr Eye Res; 2016; 41(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 25612055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparative analysis of first and second order kernels of multifocal retinogram in normal subjects].
    Luo G; Jiang F; Long S; Huang S; Wu D; Wu L
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2005 Jun; 21(2):99-102, 131. PubMed ID: 17165339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removing mains interference from the mfERG by applying a post-processing digital notch filter: for the good or the bad?
    Heinrich SP
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 144(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 34846632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of two multifocal ERG systems.
    Bock M; Andrassi M; Belitsky L; Lorenz B
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1998-1999; 97(2):157-78. PubMed ID: 10765969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of second-order kernel response components of multifocal electroretinograms elicited from normal subjects.
    Yoshii M; Yanashima K; Wada H; Sakemi F; Enoki T; Okisaka S
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2001; 45(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 11369373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of experimental glaucoma in macaques on the multifocal ERG. Multifocal ERG in laser-induced glaucoma.
    Frishman LJ; Saszik S; Harwerth RS; Viswanathan S; Li Y; Smith EL; Robson JG; Barnes G
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2000; 100(2-3):231-51. PubMed ID: 11142748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing retinal function with the multifocal technique.
    Hood DC
    Prog Retin Eye Res; 2000 Sep; 19(5):607-46. PubMed ID: 10925245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amplitude calculation in multifocal ERG: comparison of repeatability in 30 Hz flicker and first order kernel stimulation.
    Mazinani BA; Repas T; Weinberger AW; Vobig MA; Walter P
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 245(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 17053898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards optimal filtering of "standard" multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) recordings: findings in normal and diabetic subjects.
    Han Y; Bearse MA; Schneck ME; Barez S; Jacobsen C; Adams AJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Apr; 88(4):543-50. PubMed ID: 15031174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A composite nature for the photopic b-wave of the human electroretinogram as evidenced by the use of the 60 Hz notch filter.
    Lachapelle P; Molotchnikoff S
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1986 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 3955439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of aging on the first and second-order kernels of multifocal electroretinogram.
    Nabeshima T; Tazawa Y; Mita M; Sano M
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2002; 46(3):261-9. PubMed ID: 12063035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical aspects of multifocal ERG recording.
    Keating D; Parks S; Evans A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2000; 100(2-3):77-98. PubMed ID: 11142750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recording multifocal electroretinogram on and off responses in humans.
    Kondo M; Miyake Y; Horiguchi M; Suzuki S; Tanikawa A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Mar; 39(3):574-80. PubMed ID: 9501869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multifocal, pattern and full field electroretinograms in cats with unilateral optic nerve section.
    Vaegan ; Anderton PJ; Millar TJ
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2000; 100(2-3):207-29. PubMed ID: 11142747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of filter bandwidth on the multifocal electroretinogram.
    Keating D; Parks S; Evans AL; Williamson TH; Elliott AT; Jay JL
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1996-1997; 92(4):291-300. PubMed ID: 9476596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo electrical stimulation of rabbit retina with a microfabricated array: strategies to maximize responses for prospective assessment of stimulus efficacy and biocompatibility.
    Rizzo JF; Goldbaum S; Shahin M; Denison TJ; Wyatt J
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2004; 22(6):429-43. PubMed ID: 15798362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Spatial characteristics of the first-order kernels of multifocal electroretinogram waveforms with high-rate sampling and long-duration recording].
    Segawa Y
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jun; 106(6):343-51. PubMed ID: 12138696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inner retinal contributions to the multifocal electroretinogram: patients with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON). Multifocal ERG in patients with LHON.
    Kurtenbach A; Leo-Kottler B; Zrenner E
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 108(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 15573947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consecutive unilateral recording of the two eyes affects dark-adapted ERG responses, when compared to simultaneous bilateral recording.
    Ross M; Honig H; Ezra-Elia R; Banin E; Obolensky A; Averbukh E; Rosov A; Gootwine E; Ofri R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 137(3):183-192. PubMed ID: 30411184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.