BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11292034)

  • 1. Tensile fixation strengths of absorbable meniscal repair devices as a function of hydrolysis time. An in vitro experimental study.
    Arnoczky SP; Lavagnino M
    Am J Sports Med; 2001; 29(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 11292034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biomechanical comparison of the Mitek RapidLoc, Mitek Meniscal repair system, clearfix screws and vertical PDS and Ti-Cron sutures.
    Naqui SZ; Thiryayi WA; Hopgood P; Ryan WG
    Knee; 2006 Mar; 13(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 16338137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Biodegradable meniscus fixations: a comparative biomechanical study].
    Seil R; Rupp S; Jurecka C; Georg T; Kohn D
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Feb; 89(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 12610434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Failure strengths of suture vs. biodegradable arrow and staple for meniscal repair: an in vitro study.
    Walsh SP; Evans SL; O'Doherty DM; Barlow IW
    Knee; 2001 Jun; 8(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 11337243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2000 Sep; 16(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 10976122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meniscal repair devices: a clinical and biomechanical literature review.
    Farng E; Sherman O
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Mar; 20(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 15007316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Failure strength of repair devices versus meniscus suturing techniques.
    Aşík M; Sener N
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Jan; 10(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11819017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fixation strength of meniscal repair devices.
    Bellemans J; Vandenneucker H; Labey L; Van Audekercke R
    Knee; 2002 Feb; 9(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 11830375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pull-out strength and stiffness of meniscal repair using absorbable arrows or Ti-Cron vertical and horizontal loop sutures.
    Boenisch UW; Faber KJ; Ciarelli M; Steadman JR; Arnoczky SP
    Am J Sports Med; 1999; 27(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 10496581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pull-out and shear failure strengths of arthroscopic meniscal repair systems.
    Fisher SR; Markel DC; Koman JD; Atkinson TS
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Sep; 10(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 12355304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of suture material on the strength of horizontal mattress suture configuration for meniscus repair.
    Hapa O; Akşahin E; Erduran M; Davul S; Havitçioğlu H; LaPrade RF; Bozdağ E; Sünbüloğlu E
    Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):577-80. PubMed ID: 23340094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical investigations of different meniscal repair implants in comparison with horizontal sutures on human meniscus.
    Becker R; Schröder M; Stärke C; Urbach D; Nebelung W
    Arthroscopy; 2001 May; 17(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 11337709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cyclic joint loading can affect the initial stability of meniscal fixation implants.
    Dürselen L; Schneider J; Galler M; Claes LE; Bauer G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Jan; 18(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 12527246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical test comparing the load to failure of the biodegradable meniscus arrow versus meniscal suture.
    Song EK; Lee KB
    Arthroscopy; 1999 Oct; 15(7):726-32. PubMed ID: 10524820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical testing of suture-based meniscal repair devices containing ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene suture: update 2011.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Bava ED; Drew OR
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Jun; 28(6):827-34. PubMed ID: 22317797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Richards DP
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Jan; 20(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 14716278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures.
    Chang HC; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Burden R
    Am J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1846-52. PubMed ID: 16157854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failure strengths of suture versus biodegradable arrow for meniscal repair: an in vitro study.
    Dervin GF; Downing KJ; Keene GC; McBride DG
    Arthroscopy; 1997 Jun; 13(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 9195024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus.
    Kocabey Y; Chang HC; Brand JC; Nawab A; Nyland J; Caborn DN
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16581453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meniscal fixation with an absorbable staple. An experimental study in dogs.
    Koukoubis TD; Glisson RR; Feagin JA; Seaber AV; Schenkman D; Korompilias AV; Stahl DL
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 1997; 5(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 9127849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.