These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11292034)

  • 1. Tensile fixation strengths of absorbable meniscal repair devices as a function of hydrolysis time. An in vitro experimental study.
    Arnoczky SP; Lavagnino M
    Am J Sports Med; 2001; 29(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 11292034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biomechanical comparison of the Mitek RapidLoc, Mitek Meniscal repair system, clearfix screws and vertical PDS and Ti-Cron sutures.
    Naqui SZ; Thiryayi WA; Hopgood P; Ryan WG
    Knee; 2006 Mar; 13(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 16338137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Biodegradable meniscus fixations: a comparative biomechanical study].
    Seil R; Rupp S; Jurecka C; Georg T; Kohn D
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Feb; 89(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 12610434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Failure strengths of suture vs. biodegradable arrow and staple for meniscal repair: an in vitro study.
    Walsh SP; Evans SL; O'Doherty DM; Barlow IW
    Knee; 2001 Jun; 8(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 11337243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2000 Sep; 16(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 10976122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meniscal repair devices: a clinical and biomechanical literature review.
    Farng E; Sherman O
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Mar; 20(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 15007316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Failure strength of repair devices versus meniscus suturing techniques.
    Aşík M; Sener N
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Jan; 10(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11819017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fixation strength of meniscal repair devices.
    Bellemans J; Vandenneucker H; Labey L; Van Audekercke R
    Knee; 2002 Feb; 9(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 11830375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pull-out strength and stiffness of meniscal repair using absorbable arrows or Ti-Cron vertical and horizontal loop sutures.
    Boenisch UW; Faber KJ; Ciarelli M; Steadman JR; Arnoczky SP
    Am J Sports Med; 1999; 27(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 10496581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pull-out and shear failure strengths of arthroscopic meniscal repair systems.
    Fisher SR; Markel DC; Koman JD; Atkinson TS
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Sep; 10(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 12355304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of suture material on the strength of horizontal mattress suture configuration for meniscus repair.
    Hapa O; Akşahin E; Erduran M; Davul S; Havitçioğlu H; LaPrade RF; Bozdağ E; Sünbüloğlu E
    Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):577-80. PubMed ID: 23340094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical investigations of different meniscal repair implants in comparison with horizontal sutures on human meniscus.
    Becker R; Schröder M; Stärke C; Urbach D; Nebelung W
    Arthroscopy; 2001 May; 17(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 11337709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cyclic joint loading can affect the initial stability of meniscal fixation implants.
    Dürselen L; Schneider J; Galler M; Claes LE; Bauer G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2003 Jan; 18(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 12527246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical test comparing the load to failure of the biodegradable meniscus arrow versus meniscal suture.
    Song EK; Lee KB
    Arthroscopy; 1999 Oct; 15(7):726-32. PubMed ID: 10524820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical testing of suture-based meniscal repair devices containing ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene suture: update 2011.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Bava ED; Drew OR
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Jun; 28(6):827-34. PubMed ID: 22317797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Richards DP
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Jan; 20(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 14716278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures.
    Chang HC; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Burden R
    Am J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1846-52. PubMed ID: 16157854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failure strengths of suture versus biodegradable arrow for meniscal repair: an in vitro study.
    Dervin GF; Downing KJ; Keene GC; McBride DG
    Arthroscopy; 1997 Jun; 13(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 9195024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus.
    Kocabey Y; Chang HC; Brand JC; Nawab A; Nyland J; Caborn DN
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16581453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meniscal fixation with an absorbable staple. An experimental study in dogs.
    Koukoubis TD; Glisson RR; Feagin JA; Seaber AV; Schenkman D; Korompilias AV; Stahl DL
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 1997; 5(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 9127849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.