These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11292308)

  • 1. Perceptual priming for upright and inverted faces in infants and adults.
    Webb SJ; Nelson CA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 May; 79(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11292308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1518-32. PubMed ID: 15050576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 15072683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The time course of repetition effects for familiar faces and objects: an ERP study.
    Guillaume C; Guillery-Girard B; Chaby L; Lebreton K; Hugueville L; Eustache F; Fiori N
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1248():149-61. PubMed ID: 19028466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural correlates of perceptual contributions to nondeclarative memory for faces.
    Boehm SG; Klostermann EC; Paller KA
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):1021-9. PubMed ID: 16368247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2002 Feb; 15(2):353-72. PubMed ID: 11798271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Left gaze bias in humans, rhesus monkeys and domestic dogs.
    Guo K; Meints K; Hall C; Hall S; Mills D
    Anim Cogn; 2009 May; 12(3):409-18. PubMed ID: 18925420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Thatcher illusion seen by the brain: an event-related brain potentials study.
    Carbon CC; Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM; Leder H
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):544-55. PubMed ID: 16099365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inverted faces are (eventually) processed holistically.
    Richler JJ; Mack ML; Palmeri TJ; Gauthier I
    Vision Res; 2011 Feb; 51(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 21130798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemispheric asymmetries in image-specific and abstractive priming of famous faces: evidence from reaction times and event-related brain potentials.
    Cooper TJ; Harvey M; Lavidor M; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Oct; 45(13):2910-21. PubMed ID: 17663008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-related potential correlates of long-term memory for briefly presented faces.
    Joyce CA; Kutas M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):757-67. PubMed ID: 15904542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatiotemporal analysis of event-related potentials to upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces: effects on encoding and recognition.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ; Lobaugh NJ
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jul; 41(4):643-53. PubMed ID: 15189487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognising upright and inverted faces: MEG source localisation.
    Taylor MJ; Bayless SJ; Mills T; Pang EW
    Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 1381():167-74. PubMed ID: 21238433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Where and how infants look: the development of scan paths and fixations in face perception.
    Kato M; Konishi Y
    Infant Behav Dev; 2013 Feb; 36(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 23261787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms.
    Schendan HE; Ganis G; Kutas M
    Psychophysiology; 1998 May; 35(3):240-51. PubMed ID: 9564744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple contributions to priming effects for familiar faces: analyses with backward masking and event-related potentials.
    Dörr P; Herzmann G; Sommer W
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 102(4):765-82. PubMed ID: 21988383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The nature of upright and inverted face representations: an adaptation-transfer study of configuration.
    Pichler P; Dosani M; Oruç I; Barton JJ
    Cortex; 2012 Jun; 48(6):725-36. PubMed ID: 21396633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Event-related potentials of self-face recognition in children with pervasive developmental disorders.
    Gunji A; Inagaki M; Inoue Y; Takeshima Y; Kaga M
    Brain Dev; 2009 Feb; 31(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 18590948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.