BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11292405)

  • 1. Use of the HARK autorefractor in children.
    Isenberg SJ; Del Signore M; Madani-Becker G
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Apr; 131(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 11292405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children.
    Lei Y; Chen X; Cheng M; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Wang X
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 261(5):1465-1472. PubMed ID: 36527496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of the Topcon BV-1000 automated subjective refraction system.
    Dave T; Fukuma Y
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 15181357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overestimation of hyperopia with autorefraction compared with retinoscopy under cycloplegia in school-age children.
    Hashemi H; Khabazkhoob M; Asharlous A; Yekta A; Emamian MH; Fotouhi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 102(12):1717-1722. PubMed ID: 29439996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness of an autorefractor with eye-tracking capability in pediatric patients.
    Kirschen D; Isenberg SJ
    J AAPOS; 2014 Jun; 18(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 24924271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children.
    Choong YF; Chen AH; Goh PP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 16815252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The child self-refraction study results from urban Chinese children in Guangzhou.
    He M; Congdon N; MacKenzie G; Zeng Y; Silver JD; Ellwein L
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Jun; 118(6):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21232802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of objective refraction in darkness to cycloplegic refraction: a pilot study.
    Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ; Meehan K; Grk D; Cox M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 26888570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Plusoptix S12R photoscreener with cycloplegic retinoscopy and autorefraction in pediatric age group.
    Saini V; Raina UK; Gupta A; Goyal JL; Anjum R; Saini P; Gupta SK; Sharma P
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 67(10):1555-1559. PubMed ID: 31546479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeatability of ARK-30 in a pediatric population.
    Hernandez-Moreno L; Vallelado-Alvarez A; Martin R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 66(9):1262-1267. PubMed ID: 30127136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated refraction. A comparative study of automated refraction with the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor and retinoscopy.
    Salvesen S; Køhler M
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1991 Jun; 69(3):342-6. PubMed ID: 1927317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the Sphere Value Measured by an Autorefractor Reliable in Children under Cycloplegia? Comparison with Streak Retinoscopy.
    Da Gama RD; Nom TY; Da Costa DC; Dos Santos JC; Da Costa RS; Relha C
    Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano; 2013; 28(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 24372417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor.
    Kinge B; Midelfart A; Jacobsen G
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Jan; 80(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8664229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agreement and Repeatability of Noncycloplegic and Cycloplegic Wavefront-based Autorefraction in Children.
    Rauscher FG; Lange H; Yahiaoui-Doktor M; Tegetmeyer H; Sterker I; Hinz A; Wahl S; Wiedemann P; Ohlendorf A; Blendowske R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Nov; 96(11):879-889. PubMed ID: 31703049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of different autorefractors with retinoscopy in children.
    Oral Y; Gunaydin N; Ozgur O; Arsan AK; Oskan S
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2012; 49(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 22938517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical comparison of the Welch Allyn SureSight handheld autorefractor versus cycloplegic autorefraction and retinoscopic refraction.
    Iuorno JD; Grant WD; Noël LP
    J AAPOS; 2004 Apr; 8(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 15088044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of autorefraction after cataract surgery with multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation.
    Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Sakla HF
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 17720072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of cycloplegic autorefraction and retinoscopy in Indian children.
    Guha S; Shah S; Shah K; Hurakadli P; Majee D; Gandhi S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2017 Jan; 100(1):73-78. PubMed ID: 27426488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia.
    Salmon TO; van de Pol C
    Optometry; 2005 Aug; 76(8):461-72. PubMed ID: 16150413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Accuracy of two autorefractors--Pediatric Autorefractor plusoptiX and Retinomax--in cycloplegic children in comparison to retinoscopy].
    Schmidt-Bacher AE; Kahlert C; Kolling G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2010 Oct; 227(10):792-7. PubMed ID: 20963682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.