131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11294015)
1. [The STF Project: Female Tumor Screening].
Branca M; Rossi E; Cedri S; Migliore G; Midulla C; De Lorio P; Giovagnoli MR; Carraro C; Vecchione A; Bonelli L; Nicolò G; Gustavino C; Ferreri M; Barizzone D; Santi L; Morosini PL
Pathologica; 2001 Feb; 93(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 11294015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].
Spaczyński M; Nowak-Markwitz E; Januszek-Michalecka L; Karowicz-Bilińska A
Ginekol Pol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):833-8. PubMed ID: 20088397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extension of organised cervical cancer screening programmes in Italy and their process indicators.
Ronco G; Giubilato P; Naldoni C; Zorzi M; Anghinoni E; Scalisi A; Dalla Palma P; Zanier L; Federici A; Angeloni C; Prandini S; Maglietta R; Mancini E; Pizzuti R; Iossa A; Segnan N; Zappa M
Epidemiol Prev; 2007; 31(2-3 Suppl 2):33-47. PubMed ID: 17824361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Women's knowledge about cervical cancer risk factors, screening, and reasons for non-participation in cervical cancer screening programme in Estonia.
Kivistik A; Lang K; Baili P; Anttila A; Veerus P
BMC Womens Health; 2011 Sep; 11():43. PubMed ID: 21951661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Educational level, voluntary private health insurance and opportunistic cancer screening among women in Catalonia (Spain).
Borràs JM; Guillen M; Sánchez V; Juncà S; Vicente R
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1999 Oct; 8(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 10548398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A mobile unit: an effective service for cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Tatip Y; Boonmak C
Int J Epidemiol; 1999 Feb; 28(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10195661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Uterine cervix smears: their strengths and weaknesses in 2008].
Vacher-Lavenu MC
Ann Pathol; 2008 Nov; 28 Spec No 1(1):S87-9. PubMed ID: 18984314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a mobile unit on changes in knowledge and use of cervical cancer screening among rural Thai women.
Swaddiwudhipong W; Chaovakiratipong C; Nguntra P; Mahasakpan P; Lerdlukanavonge P; Koonchote S
Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Jun; 24(3):493-8. PubMed ID: 7672887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of regular 3-yearly screening on the incidence of cervical smears: the Leiden experience.
Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ; Wijsman-Grootendorst A
Cytopathology; 1990; 1(4):201-10. PubMed ID: 2101670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design and methods of the evaluation of an HPV-based cervical cancer screening strategy in Mexico: The Morelos HPV Study.
Flores Y; Shah K; Lazcano E; Hernández M; Bishai D; Ferris DG; Lörincz A; Hernández P; Salmerón J;
Salud Publica Mex; 2002; 44(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 12216521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Personal factors influence use of cervical cancer screening services: epidemiological survey and linked administrative data address the limitations of previous research.
Olesen SC; Butterworth P; Jacomb P; Tait RJ
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Feb; 12():34. PubMed ID: 22333392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health education to increase screening for cervical cancer among Lumbee Indian women in North Carolina.
Dignan MB; Michielutte R; Wells HB; Sharp P; Blinson K; Case LD; Bell R; Konen J; Davis S; McQuellon RP
Health Educ Res; 1998 Dec; 13(4):545-56. PubMed ID: 10345905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical smear abnormalities in the United Arab Emirates: a pilot study in the Arabian Gulf.
Ghazal-Aswad S; Gargash H; Badrinath P; Al-Sharhan MA; Sidky I; Osman N; Chan NH
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 16514839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 'I got a letter...' a qualitative study of women's reasoning about attendance in a cervical cancer screening programme in urban Sweden.
Forss A; Tishelman C; Widmark C; Lundgren E; Sachs L; Törnberg S
Psychooncology; 2001; 10(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 11180579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].
Ronco G; Biggeri A; Confortini M; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Accetta G; Giordano L; Cogo C; Carozzi F; Gillio Tos A; Arbyn M; Mejier CJ; Snijders PJ; Cuzick J; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72. PubMed ID: 22828243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of a cognition-emotion focused program to increase public participation in Papanicolaou smear screening.
Park S; Chang S; Chung C
Public Health Nurs; 2005; 22(4):289-98. PubMed ID: 16150010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Women at risk: papanicolaou smear screening in Florida.
Vincent AL; Greene JN; Hoercherl S; McTague D
J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(5):302-7. PubMed ID: 9260433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
