660 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11295633)
1. Prostate cancer chemoprevention: Strategies for designing efficient clinical trials.
Lieberman R
Urology; 2001 Apr; 57(4 Suppl 1):224-9. PubMed ID: 11295633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design considerations for efficient prostate cancer chemoprevention trials.
Lee JJ; Lieberman R; Sloan JA; Piantadosi S; Lippman SM
Urology; 2001 Apr; 57(4 Suppl 1):205-12. PubMed ID: 11295629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chemoprevention of prostate cancer: current status and future directions.
Lieberman R
Cancer Metastasis Rev; 2002; 21(3-4):297-309. PubMed ID: 12549768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Executive Summary of the National Cancer Institute Workshop: Highlights and recommendations.
Lieberman R; Nelson WG; Sakr WA; Meyskens FL; Klein EA; Wilding G; Partin AW; Lee JJ; Lippman SM
Urology; 2001 Apr; 57(4 Suppl 1):4-27. PubMed ID: 11295590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cancer risk factors for selecting cohorts for large-scale chemoprevention trials.
Greenwald P
J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1996; 25():29-36. PubMed ID: 9027595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Progress in cancer chemoprevention: perspectives on agent selection and short-term clinical intervention trials.
Kelloff GJ; Boone CW; Steele VE; Crowell JA; Lubet R; Sigman CC
Cancer Res; 1994 Apr; 54(7 Suppl):2015s-2024s. PubMed ID: 8137331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chemoprevention of prostate cancer: concepts and strategies.
Kelloff GJ; Lieberman R; Steele VE; Boone CW; Lubet RA; Kopelovitch L; Malone WA; Crowell JA; Sigman CC
Eur Urol; 1999; 35(5-6):342-50. PubMed ID: 10325487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancer diagnosis among men with isolated high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia enrolled onto a 3-year prospective phase III clinical trial of oral toremifene.
Taneja SS; Morton R; Barnette G; Sieber P; Hancock ML; Steiner M
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(5):523-9. PubMed ID: 23295793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strategies for phase II cancer chemoprevention trials: cervix, endometrium, and ovary.
Kelloff GJ; Boone CW; Crowell JA; Nayfield SG; Hawk E; Steele VE; Lubet RA; Sigman CC
J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1995; 23():1-9. PubMed ID: 8747372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized double-blind placebo controlled phase I-II study on clinical and molecular effects of dietary supplements in men with precancerous prostatic lesions. Chemoprevention or "chemopromotion"?
Gontero P; Marra G; Soria F; Oderda M; Zitella A; Baratta F; Chiorino G; Gregnanin I; Daniele L; Cattel L; Frea B; Brusa P
Prostate; 2015 Aug; 75(11):1177-86. PubMed ID: 25893930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Designing a randomized phase I/II prostate cancer chemoprevention trial using 1alpha-hydroxy-24-ethyl-cholecalciferol, an analogue of vitamin D3.
Packianathan S; Mehta RG; Mehta RR; Hall WH; Boerner PS; Beckett LA; Vijayakumar S
Cancer J; 2004; 10(6):357-67. PubMed ID: 15701267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk biomarkers and current strategies for cancer chemoprevention.
Kelloff GJ; Boone CW; Crowell JA; Nayfield SG; Hawk E; Malone WF; Steele VE; Lubet RA; Sigman CC
J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1996; 25():1-14. PubMed ID: 9027592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Target populations and strategies for chemoprevention trials of prostate cancer.
Bostwick DG
J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1994; 19():191-6. PubMed ID: 7823591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agents, biomarkers, and cohorts for chemopreventive agent development in prostate cancer.
Kelloff GJ; Lieberman R; Steele VE; Boone CW; Lubet RA; Kopelovich L; Malone WA; Crowell JA; Higley HR; Sigman CC
Urology; 2001 Apr; 57(4 Suppl 1):46-51. PubMed ID: 11295594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolving strategies for prostate cancer chemoprevention trials.
Lieberman R
World J Urol; 2003 May; 21(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 12682772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence-based medical perspectives: the evolving role of PSA for early detection, monitoring of treatment response, and as a surrogate end point of efficacy for interventions in men with different clinical risk states for the prevention and progression of prostate cancer.
Lieberman R
Am J Ther; 2004; 11(6):501-6. PubMed ID: 15543092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate cancer chemoprevention agent development: the National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention portfolio.
Parnes HL; House MG; Kagan J; Kausal DJ; Lieberman R
J Urol; 2004 Feb; 171(2 Pt 2):S68-74; discussion S75. PubMed ID: 14713758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of surrogate endpoint biomarkers in prostate cancer chemoprevention trials.
Trock BJ
Urology; 2001 Apr; 57(4 Suppl 1):241-7. PubMed ID: 11295636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized, controlled chemoprevention trials in populations at very high risk for prostate cancer: Elevated prostate-specific antigen and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
Clark LC; Marshall JR
Urology; 2001 Apr; 57(4 Suppl 1):185-7. PubMed ID: 11295623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and other prostatic lesions as risk factors and surrogate endpoints for cancer chemoprevention trials.
Bostwick DG; Aquilina JW
J Cell Biochem Suppl; 1996; 25():156-64. PubMed ID: 9027613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
