115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11296506)
1. A critical evaluation of the pitchfork analysis.
Männchen R
Eur J Orthod; 2001 Feb; 23(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11296506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and the smallest detectable differences of lateral cephalometric measurements.
Damstra J; Huddleston Slater JJ; Fourie Z; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):546.e1-8; discussion 546-7. PubMed ID: 21055590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.
Proff P; Will F; Bokan I; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 18416608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in skeletal Class II diagnosis using various cephalometric analyses.
Contardo L; Ceschi M; Castaldo A; Denotti G; Di Lenarda R
J Clin Orthod; 2008 Jul; 42(7):389-92. PubMed ID: 18794575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
Cho HJ
J Clin Orthod; 2009 Apr; 43(4):235-52, discussion 235; quiz 273. PubMed ID: 19458456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dental and skeletal outcomes for Class II surgical-orthodontic treatment: A comparison between novice and experienced clinicians.
Potts B; Fields HW; Shanker S; Vig KW; Beck FM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 21392684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glenoid fossa position in Class II malocclusion associated with mandibular retrusion.
Giuntini V; De Toffol L; Franchi L; Baccetti T
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):808-12. PubMed ID: 18298205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Second Class Resolver: a retrospective analysis.
D'Attilio M; Rodolfino D; Filippakos A; Saccucci M; Festa F; Tripodi D
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Mar; 15(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 24745598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving Class II malocclusion as a side-effect of rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective clinical study.
Guest SS; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 21055598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the relevance of "ideal" occlusion concepts for incisor inclination target definition.
Knösel M; Jung K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 22051485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.
Kerr WJ; Ford I
Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 1928822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing Class III patients.
Baccetti T; De Clerck HJ; Cevidanes LH; Franchi L
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 21187527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic and random errors associated with Johnston's cephalometric analysis.
Keeling SD; Cabassa SR; King GJ
Br J Orthod; 1993 May; 20(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 8518263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients.
Chaiyongsirisern A; Rabie AB; Wong RW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1084-94. PubMed ID: 19852598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
