These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11296506)

  • 21. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
    Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Changes of occlusal plane inclination after orthodontic treatment in different dentoskeletal frames.
    Li JL; Kau C; Wang M
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Jun; 15(1):41. PubMed ID: 25033937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Eastman Standard Incisor Angulations: are they still appropriate?
    MacAllister MJ; Rock WP
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Feb; 19(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1562579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Sanggarnjanavanich S; Sekiya T; Nomura Y; Nakayama T; Hanada N; Nakamura Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 24975002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of progressive cephalometric changes and postsurgical stability of skeletal Class III correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment.
    Ko EW; Hsu SS; Hsieh HY; Wang YC; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1469-77. PubMed ID: 21256648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relapse of orthodontically corrected deepbites in accordance with growth pattern.
    Pollard D; Akyalcin S; Wiltshire WA; Rody WJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 22464530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Kim LH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Centroid analysis of twin-block appliance treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Trenouth MJ
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 16779975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A long-term assessment of the mechanical retroclination of lower incisors.
    Mills JR
    Angle Orthod; 1967 Jul; 37(3):165-74. PubMed ID: 19919212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Treatment of adult Class III malocclusions with orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery: receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Tseng YC; Pan CY; Chou ST; Liao CY; Lai ST; Chen CM; Chang HP; Yang YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):e485-93. PubMed ID: 21536190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study.
    Aras A; Cinsar A; Bulut H
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing skeletal relationships using the cervical vertebral curvature.
    Shaikh A; Khan M; Rashna HS
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 22360079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Masseter muscle thickness as a predictive variable in treatment outcome of the twin-block appliance and masseteric thickness changes during treatment.
    Kiliaridis S; Mills CM; Antonarakis GS
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 Nov; 13(4):203-13. PubMed ID: 21040463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of extraction and non-extraction treatment effects by two different superimposition methods.
    Türköz Ç; İşcan HN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 21378094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.