These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11296506)

  • 41. Reliability of cephalometric analysis using manual and interactive computer methods.
    Davis DN; Mackay F
    Br J Orthod; 1991 May; 18(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 1911687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
    Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction.
    Cordua T; Deli R; Giuliante L; Ursini R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 22031992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dento-skeletal effects of the Pendulum Hygienic Distalizer.
    Ba-Yazed AH; Hafez AM; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):21-5. PubMed ID: 25745706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
    Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Occlusal alterations in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis.
    Pelo S; Marianetti TM; Cacucci L; Di Nardo F; Borrelli A; Di Rocco C; Tamburrini G; Moro A; Gasparini G; Deli R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 21466946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
    Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry.
    Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [The potentiality of antero-posterior orthodontic extraoral traction: clinical and cephalometric results].
    Deblock L; Becker A
    Orthod Fr; 1992; 63 Pt 2():381-93. PubMed ID: 1341727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of the variable anchorage straightwire technique using Ricketts' growth prediction.
    Parikakis KA; Moberg S; Hellsing E
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 18832190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Base of the skull morphology and Class III malocclusion in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Tinano MM; Martins MA; Bendo CB; Mazzieiro Ê
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 25741829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
    Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.
    Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. On the interaction between incisor crown-root morphology and third-order angulation.
    Knösel M; Jung K; Attin T; Engelke W; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Gripp-Rudolph L; Attin R
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):454-61. PubMed ID: 19413389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Changes in orthodontic cephalometric reference points on application of orthopedic force to jaw: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Katada H; Katada H; Isshiki Y
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2005 Aug; 46(3):59-65. PubMed ID: 16598182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients. Hyrax versus transverse sagittal maxillary expander: a cephalometric investigation.
    Farronato G; Maspero C; Esposito L; Briguglio E; Farronato D; Giannini L
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 21059876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of Twin-Block and Faramand-LL appliances on soft tissue profile in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Yassaei S; Jamilian A; Joshan N
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):57-62. PubMed ID: 25745712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study.
    Lund DI; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 9457025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.