95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11296633)
1. [Accuracy of pressure measurements obtained with a new rectal balloon catheter].
Le Normand L; Glemain P; Cordonnier JP; Brunel P; Karam G; Boullanger P; Buzelin JM
Prog Urol; 2001 Feb; 11(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 11296633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Recommendations for the urodynamic examination in the investigation of non-neurological female urinary incontinence].
Hermieu JF;
Prog Urol; 2007 Nov; 17(6 Suppl 2):1264-84. PubMed ID: 18214138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of air-charged and water-filled urodynamic pressure measurement catheters.
Cooper MA; Fletter PC; Zaszczurynski PJ; Damaser MS
Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Mar; 30(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 21305591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective trial comparing solid-state catheter and water-perfusion triple-lumen catheter for sphincter of Oddi manometry done at the time of ERCP.
Draganov PV; Kowalczyk L; Forsmark CE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jul; 70(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 19386306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Reliability of pressure measures determined with probes used for establishing the urethral pressure profile by the perfusion method].
Le Normand L; Glemain P; Cordonnier JP; Wetzel O; Bochereau G; Buzelin JM
Prog Urol; 1995 Dec; 5(6):980-4. PubMed ID: 8777408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous intra-abdominal pressure measurement technique.
Balogh Z; Jones F; D'Amours S; Parr M; Sugrue M
Am J Surg; 2004 Dec; 188(6):679-84. PubMed ID: 15619483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of minimally invasive analysis system for cough leak point pressure measurement.
Kocjancic E; Tarrano E; Panella M; Crivellaro S; Smith JJ; Maso G; Favro M; Ceratti G; Gontero P; Frea B
J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):994-7. PubMed ID: 15311021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of the rectosigmoid pacemaker and electric activity in rectal motility: mechanism and clinical significance.
Shafik A; Mostafa RM; Ahmed I; el-Sibai O
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Sep; 42(6):377-83. PubMed ID: 12224475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of three neonatal resuscitation devices.
Bennett S; Finer NN; Rich W; Vaucher Y
Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 16081202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of closed system suction on airway pressures when using the Servo 300 ventilator.
Frengley RW; Closey DN; Sleigh JW; Torrance JM
Crit Care Resusc; 2001 Dec; 3(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 16573511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bench test assessment of the new Raumedic Neurovent-P ICP sensor: a technical report by the BrainIT group.
Citerio G; Piper I; Cormio M; Galli D; Cazzaniga S; Enblad P; Nilsson P; Contant C; Chambers I;
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2004 Nov; 146(11):1221-6. PubMed ID: 15338335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new ultrasound-guided esophageal variceal pressure-measuring device.
Miller LS; Dai Q; Thomas A; Chung CY; Park J; Irizarry S; Nguyen T; Thangada V; Miller ES; Kim JK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jul; 99(7):1267-73. PubMed ID: 15233664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Esophageal pressure measurements under different conditions of intrathoracic pressure. An in vitro study of second generation balloon catheters.
Mojoli F; Chiumello D; Pozzi M; Algieri I; Bianzina S; Luoni S; Volta CA; Braschi A; Brochard L
Minerva Anestesiol; 2015 Aug; 81(8):855-64. PubMed ID: 25634481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Videomanometry of the pelvic organs: a comparison of the normal lower urinary and gastrointestinal tracts.
Ito T; Sakakibara R; Uchiyama T; Zhi L; Yamamoto T; Hattori T
Int J Urol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 16448429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Urethral pressure reflectometry vs urethral pressure profilometry in women: a comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy.
Klarskov N; Lose G
BJU Int; 2007 Aug; 100(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 17501964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of air-filled and water-filled catheters for use in cystometric assessment.
Sheng W; Kirschner-Hermanns R
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2061-2067. PubMed ID: 30888456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation and experience with a simple continuous intra-abdominal pressure measurement technique in a multidisciplinary medical/surgical critical care unit.
Zengerink I; McBeth PB; Zygun DA; Ranson K; Ball CG; Laupland KB; Widder S; Kirkpatrick AW
J Trauma; 2008 May; 64(5):1159-64. PubMed ID: 18469635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative urodynamic patterns of bladder pressure, contractility and urine flow in man and rat during micturition.
Schmidt F; Yoshimura Y; Shin PY; Constantinou CE
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (109):39-44. PubMed ID: 12874948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aggressive surveillance and early catheter-directed therapy in the management of intra-abdominal hypertension.
Reed SF; Britt RC; Collins J; Weireter L; Cole F; Britt LD
J Trauma; 2006 Dec; 61(6):1359-63; discussion 1363-5. PubMed ID: 17159677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Traditional Foley drainage systems--do they drain the bladder?
Garcia MM; Gulati S; Liepmann D; Stackhouse GB; Greene K; Stoller ML
J Urol; 2007 Jan; 177(1):203-7; discussion 207. PubMed ID: 17162043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
