63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11296781)
1. Technical aspect of ThinPrep.
Song LH; Goh ES; Phang LC; Poh WT; Tay SK
Singapore Med J; 2000 Dec; 41(12):575-8. PubMed ID: 11296781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The unsatisfactory ThinPrep® Pap Test™: analysis of technical aspects, most common causes, and recommendations for improvement.
Rosa M; Pragasam P; Saremian J; Aoalin A; Graf W; Mohammadi A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Jul; 41(7):588-94. PubMed ID: 22833404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ThinPrep detection of cervical and endometrial adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.
Schorge JO; Hossein Saboorian M; Hynan L; Ashfaq R
Cancer; 2002 Dec; 96(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 12478681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restoring satisfactory status in ThinPrep Pap test specimens with too few squamous cells and containing microscopic red blood cells.
Pang Y; Smola B; Pu RT; Michael CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Oct; 36(10):696-700. PubMed ID: 18773435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Has the ThinPrep method of cervical screening maintained its improvement over conventional smears in terms of specimen adequacy?
Treacy A; Reynolds J; Kay EW; Leader M; Grace A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Apr; 37(4):239-40. PubMed ID: 19217033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protocol for the processing of bloody cervical specimens: glacial acetic acid and the ThinPrep Pap Test.
Haack LA; O'Brien D; Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Mar; 34(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 16470866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ThinPrep pap test: a platform for gynecological diagnosis.
Scimia M
Adv Clin Path; 2001 Oct; 5(4):183-4. PubMed ID: 17582941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reprocessing unsatisfactory ThinPrep Papanicolaou test specimens increases sample adequacy and detection of significant cervicovaginal lesions.
Islam S; West AM; Saboorian MH; Ashfaq R
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 15098249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of the ThinPrep Pap test and conventional cytology results in a Canadian cohort.
Duggan MA; Khalil M; Brasher PM; Nation JG
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16548991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison.
Chacho MS; Mattie ME; Schwartz PE
Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Not all unsatisfactory ThinPrep cervical Pap tests are unsatisfactory: Reprocessing improves the satisfactory and detection rates of ThinPrep cervical cytology.
AbdullGaffar B; Kamal MO
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Sep; 38(9):699-701. PubMed ID: 19950397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations in pancreatic fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
de Luna R; Eloubeidi MA; Sheffield MV; Eltoum I; Jhala N; Jhala D; Chen VK; Chhieng DC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Feb; 30(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 14755754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ThinPrep for cytologic evaluation of follicular thyroid lesions: correlation with histologic findings.
Tulecke MA; Wang HH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Jan; 30(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 14696138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Why we prefer the thin layer technique to conventional Pap smears. A double-blind study of 473 specimens].
Boman F; Farré I; Farine MO; Leroy JL; Gauthier A; Querleu D; Vacher-Lavenu MC
Clin Exp Pathol; 1999; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 10398579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The efficacy of reprocessing unsatisfactory cervicovaginal ThinPrep specimens with and without glacial acetic acid: effect on Hybrid Capture II human papillomavirus testing and clinical follow-up.
Agoff SN; Dean T; Nixon BK; Ingalls-Severn K; Rinker L; Grieco VS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Nov; 118(5):727-32. PubMed ID: 12428793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Liquid-based cervical cytology.
Klinkhamer PJ; Meerding WJ; Rosier PF; Hanselaar AG
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):263-71. PubMed ID: 14579292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chlamydia trachomatis and Pap testing from a single, fluid-based sample. A multicenter study.
Inhorn SL; Wand PJ; Wright TC; Hatch KD; Hallum J; Lentrichia BB
J Reprod Med; 2001 Mar; 46(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 11304865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytologic features of endocervical glandular lesions: comparison of SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional smear specimen preparations.
Belsley NA; Tambouret RH; Misdraji J; Muzikansky A; Russell DK; Wilbur DC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Apr; 36(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 18335553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of specimen order on Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae test performance and adequacy of Papanicolaou smear.
Ghanem KG; Koumans EH; Johnson RE; Sawyer MK; Papp JR; Unger ER; Black CM; Markowitz LE
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 19(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 16472725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
