These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11296866)

  • 1. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict.
    Gavrilets S; Arnqvist G; Friberg U
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1466):531-9. PubMed ID: 11296866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.
    Houle D; Kondrashov AS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jan; 269(1486):97-104. PubMed ID: 11788042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female mate choice and male social dominance.
    Moore AJ; Gowaty PA; Wallin WG; Moore PJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Mar; 268(1466):517-23. PubMed ID: 11296864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The dynamics of sexually antagonistic coevolution and the complex influences of mating system and genetic correlation.
    Härdling R; Karlsson K
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 19500598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual selection and mate choice.
    Andersson M; Simmons LW
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2006 Jun; 21(6):296-302. PubMed ID: 16769428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female preferences for indicators of male quality.
    van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Dec; 168(6):742-57. PubMed ID: 17109317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Remodeling male coercion and the evolution of sexual autonomy by mate choice.
    Snow SS; Prum RO
    Evolution; 2023 Jun; 77(7):1564-1577. PubMed ID: 37260260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition.
    Blows MW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jun; 269(1496):1113-8. PubMed ID: 12061953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Good vs complementary genes for parasite resistance and the evolution of mate choice.
    Howard RS; Lively CM
    BMC Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 4():48. PubMed ID: 15555062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Male mate choice, male quality, and the potential for sexual selection on female traits under polygyny.
    Fitzpatrick CL; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2017 Jan; 71(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 27804119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kin selection and the evolution of sexual conflict.
    Rankin DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 21054623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases.
    Kokko H; Brooks R; Jennions MD; Morley J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Mar; 270(1515):653-64. PubMed ID: 12769467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolution of costly mate choice against segregation distorters.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2017 Dec; 71(12):2817-2828. PubMed ID: 29071709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.
    Orteiza N; Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16135126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes.
    Hosken DJ; Stockley P; Tregenza T; Wedell N
    Annu Rev Entomol; 2009; 54():361-78. PubMed ID: 18793102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.