These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11296880)

  • 1. An in vivo analysis of the motion of the peri-talar joint complex based on MR imaging.
    Stindel E; Udupa JK; Hirsch BE; Odhner D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Feb; 48(2):236-47. PubMed ID: 11296880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Six DOF in vivo kinematics of the ankle joint complex: Application of a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique.
    de Asla RJ; Wan L; Rubash HE; Li G
    J Orthop Res; 2006 May; 24(5):1019-27. PubMed ID: 16609963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A MR imaging procedure to measure tarsal bone rotations.
    Wolf P; Luechinger R; Boesiger P; Stuessi E; Stacoff A
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):931-36. PubMed ID: 18067399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of in vivo 3-D internal kinematics of the joints of the foot.
    Udupa JK; Hirsch BE; Hillstrom HJ; Bauer GR; Kneeland JB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Nov; 45(11):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9805837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A characterization of the geometric architecture of the peritalar joint complex via MRI: an aid to the classification of foot type.
    Stindel E; Udupa JK; Hirsch BE; Odhner D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Sep; 18(9):753-63. PubMed ID: 10571380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional in vivo motion of adult hind foot bones.
    Mattingly B; Talwalkar V; Tylkowski C; Stevens DB; Hardy PA; Pienkowski D
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):726-33. PubMed ID: 16439242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of landing on the supination and pronation in the foot joint.
    Maeda A; Ebashi H; Nishizono H; Shibayama H; Tanaka M
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1998 Dec; 27(1-2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11579694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional in vivo kinematics of the subtalar joint during dorsi-plantarflexion and inversion-eversion.
    Goto A; Moritomo H; Itohara T; Watanabe T; Sugamoto K
    Foot Ankle Int; 2009 May; 30(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 19439144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of volume sub-sampling on motion estimation of joints via MR imaging.
    Sekaran D
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Apr; 33(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 19201162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation between anatomic foot and ankle movement measured with MRI and with a motion analysis system.
    Marquez-Barrientos C; Liu XC; Lyon R; Tassone C; Thometz J; Tarima S
    Gait Posture; 2012 Jul; 36(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 22542241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of passive motion characteristics of the ankle joint complex using dual Euler angle parameters.
    Ying N; Kim W; Wong Y; Kam BH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Feb; 19(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 14967578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Passive motion characteristics of the talocrural and the subtalar joint by dual Euler angles.
    Wong Y; Kim W; Ying N
    J Biomech; 2005 Dec; 38(12):2480-5. PubMed ID: 16214496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional analysis of normal ankle and foot mobility.
    Kitaoka HB; Luo ZP; An KN
    Am J Sports Med; 1997; 25(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 9079181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of elbow position on the range of supination and pronation of the forearm.
    Shaaban H; Pereira C; Williams R; Lees VC
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2008 Feb; 33(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18332013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic changes in the shape of the triangular fibrocartilage complex during rotation demonstrated with high resolution magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nakamura T; Yabe Y; Horiuchi Y
    J Hand Surg Br; 1999 Jun; 24(3):338-41. PubMed ID: 10433450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying rearfoot-forefoot coordination in human walking.
    Chang R; Van Emmerik R; Hamill J
    J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):3101-5. PubMed ID: 18778823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanics of the ankle and subtalar joints revealed through a 3D quasi-static stress MRI technique.
    Siegler S; Udupa JK; Ringleb SI; Imhauser CW; Hirsch BE; Odhner D; Saha PK; Okereke E; Roach N
    J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):567-78. PubMed ID: 15652556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A stereophotographic study of ankle joint contact area.
    Millington S; Grabner M; Wozelka R; Hurwitz S; Crandall J
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1465-73. PubMed ID: 17580338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting talocalcaneal joint orientations from talocalcaneal/talocrural joint orientations.
    Engsberg JR; Grimston SK; Wackwitz JH
    J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(5):749-57. PubMed ID: 3404332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of the 3D relative movement of external marker sets vs. bones based on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sangeux M; Marin F; Charleux F; Dürselen L; Ho Ba Tho MC
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):984-91. PubMed ID: 16844273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.