209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11296938)
21. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of outcomes in children with hearing aids and cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Olds J; Gaboury I; McCrae R; Schramm D; Durieux-Smith A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Feb; 13(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 22340747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cochlear implant in patients with residual hearing.
Shiomi Y; Naito Y; Honjo I; Fujiki N; Kaneko K; Takahashi H; Yamashita M; Kawano M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 1999 Oct; 26(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 10530732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comprehensive hearing aid assessment in adults with bilateral severe-profound sensorineural hearing loss who present for Cochlear implant evaluation.
Lupo JE; Biever A; Kelsall DC
Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(2):102300. PubMed ID: 31761407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison between bilateral cochlear implants and Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP Binaural cochlear implant: speech perception, sound localization and patient self-assessment.
Bonnard D; Lautissier S; Bosset-Audoit A; Coriat G; Beraha M; Maunoury A; Martel J; Darrouzet V; Bébéar JP; Dauman R
Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 23548561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cochlear implantation outcome in straightforward cases: can we do more for adults who cannot understand speech using hearing aids alone?
Luntz M; Khuri M; Khayr R; Gedaon Khuri W; Yehudai N; Shpak T
Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 138(12):1070-1079. PubMed ID: 30686138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of a revised indication for determining adult cochlear implant candidacy.
Sladen DP; Gifford RH; Haynes D; Kelsall D; Benson A; Lewis K; Zwolan T; Fu QJ; Gantz B; Gilden J; Westerberg B; Gustin C; O'Neil L; Driscoll CL
Laryngoscope; 2017 Oct; 127(10):2368-2374. PubMed ID: 28233910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. From hearing with a cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid (CI/HA) to hearing with two cochlear implants (CI/CI): a within-subject design comparison.
Luntz M; Egra-Dagan D; Attias J; Yehudai N; Most T; Shpak T
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1682-90. PubMed ID: 25275862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?].
Müller-Deile J; Rudert H; Brademann G; Frese K
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9577819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants.
Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation.
Adunka OF; Buss E; Clark MS; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Selection of cochlear electrode array implantation lengths and outcomes in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss].
Niu XM; Ping L; Gao RZ; Xia X; Fan XM; Chen Y; Fan Y; Chen XW
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 101(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 33455125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of electrode deactivation on speech recognition in multichannel cochlear implant recipients.
Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Nov; 18(6):324-334. PubMed ID: 28793847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Expanding unilateral cochlear implantation criteria for adults with bilateral acquired severe sensorineural hearing loss.
Huinck WJ; Mylanus EAM; Snik AFM
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 May; 276(5):1313-1320. PubMed ID: 30810818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
