These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11297023)

  • 21. Chinese version of the Constant-Murley questionnaire for shoulder pain and disability: a reliability and validation study.
    Yao M; Yang L; Cao ZY; Cheng SD; Tian SL; Sun YL; Wang J; Xu BP; Hu XC; Wang YJ; Zhang Y; Cui XJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Sep; 15(1):178. PubMed ID: 28923113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
    Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A clinical trial to evaluate the measurement properties of 2 direct preference instruments administered with and without hypothetical marker states.
    Schünemann HJ; Griffith L; Stubbing D; Goldstein R; Guyatt GH
    Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 12693876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. iMPACT3: online tools for development of web sites for the study of Patients' preferences and utilities.
    Lenert LA
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():1172. PubMed ID: 11080026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of utility scores from the Visual Analog Scale and Health Utilities Index 3 in children following pediatric intensive care unit admission.
    Ebrahim S; Parshuram C
    J Child Health Care; 2015 Mar; 19(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 23939724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Feasibility and reliability of a mailed questionnaire to obtain visual analogue scale valuations for health states defined by the Health Utilities Index Mark 3.
    Raat H; Bonsel GJ; Hoogeveen WC; Essink-Bot ML;
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 14713735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of assessment method and respondent population on utilities elicited for Gaucher disease.
    Clarke AE; Goldstein MK; Michelson D; Garber AM; Lenert LA
    Qual Life Res; 1997 Mar; 6(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 9161117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validation of Portuguese-translated computer touch-screen questionnaires in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis, compared with paper formats.
    Cunha-Miranda L; Santos H; Miguel C; Silva C; Barcelos F; Borges J; Trinca R; Vicente V; Silva T
    Rheumatol Int; 2015 Dec; 35(12):2029-35. PubMed ID: 26346588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A web-compatible instrument for measuring self-reported disease activity in arthritis.
    Athale N; Sturley A; Skoczen S; Kavanaugh A; Lenert L
    J Rheumatol; 2004 Feb; 31(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 14760788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Testing subject comprehension of utility questionnaires.
    Dobrez DG; Calhoun EA
    Qual Life Res; 2004 Mar; 13(2):369-76. PubMed ID: 15085909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The side effects of antipsychotic drugs and patients' quality of life: patient education and preference assessment with computers and multimedia.
    Morss SE; Lenert LA; Faustman WO
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1993; ():17-21. PubMed ID: 7907504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient utilities in fibromyalgia and the association with other outcome measures.
    Bakker C; Rutten M; van Santen-Hoeufft M; Bolwijn P; van Doorslaer E; Bennett K; van der Linden S
    J Rheumatol; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1536-43. PubMed ID: 7473480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patient utilities in ankylosing spondylitis and the association with other outcome measures.
    Bakker C; Rutten-van Mölken M; Hidding A; van Doorslaer E; Bennett K; van der Linden S
    J Rheumatol; 1994 Jul; 21(7):1298-304. PubMed ID: 7966073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient utilities in chronic musculoskeletal pain: how useful is the standard gamble method?
    Goossens ME; Vlaeyen JW; Rutten-van Mölken MP; van der Linden SM
    Pain; 1999 Mar; 80(1-2):365-75. PubMed ID: 10204750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of the web-based Spanish and Catalan versions of the Euroqol 5D-Y (EQ-5D-Y) and comparison of results with the paper version.
    Robles N; Rajmil L; Rodriguez-Arjona D; Azuara M; Codina F; Raat H; Ravens-Sieberer U; Herdman M
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Jun; 13():72. PubMed ID: 26037720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of yoruba version of the short-form 36 health survey.
    Mbada CE; Adeogun GA; Ogunlana MO; Adedoyin RA; Akinsulore A; Awotidebe TO; Idowu OA; Olaoye OA
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Sep; 13():141. PubMed ID: 26370833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Marker states and a health state prompt provide modest improvements in the reliability and validity of the standard gamble and rating scale in prostate cancer patients.
    Bremner KE; Tomlinson G; Krahn MD
    Qual Life Res; 2007 Dec; 16(10):1665-75. PubMed ID: 17912614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patient and community preferences for outcomes in prostate cancer: implications for clinical policy.
    Krahn M; Ritvo P; Irvine J; Tomlinson G; Bremner KE; Bezjak A; Trachtenberg J; Naglie G
    Med Care; 2003 Jan; 41(1):153-64. PubMed ID: 12544552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Stoma Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With a Colostomy or Ileostomy in Brazil: A Cross-sectional Study.
    Lívia de Oliveira A; Loures Mendes L; Pereira Netto M; Gonçalves Leite IC
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 May; 63(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 28570247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Utility elicitation using single-item questions compared with a computerized interview.
    Lenert LA; Sherbourne CD; Reyna V
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 11310952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.