122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11297894)
1. A mail survey of United States hematologists and oncologists: a comparison of business reply versus stamped return envelopes.
Streiff MB; Dundes L; Spivak JL
J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 54(4):430-2. PubMed ID: 11297894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do postage stamps versus pre-paid envelopes increase responses to patient mail surveys? A randomised controlled trial.
Lavelle K; Todd C; Campbell M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 May; 8():113. PubMed ID: 18507819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response rates to surveys with self-addressed, stamped envelopes versus a self-addressed label.
Groves BW; Olsson RH
Psychol Rep; 2000 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1226-8. PubMed ID: 10932585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The diagnosis and management of polycythemia vera in the era since the Polycythemia Vera Study Group: a survey of American Society of Hematology members' practice patterns.
Streiff MB; Smith B; Spivak JL
Blood; 2002 Feb; 99(4):1144-9. PubMed ID: 11830459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects on response rates and costs of stamps vs business reply in a mail survey of physicians.
Urban N; Anderson GL; Tseng A
J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 May; 46(5):455-9. PubMed ID: 8501471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Growth factor practice patterns among pediatric oncologists: results of a 1998 Pediatric Oncology Group Survey. Economic Evaluation Working Group the Pediatric Oncology Group.
Parsons SK; Mayer DK; Alexander SW; Xu R; Land V; Laver J
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2000; 22(3):227-41. PubMed ID: 10864054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of erythropoietin in cancer patients: assessment of oncologists' practice patterns in the United States and other countries.
Adams JR; Elting LS; Lyman GH; George JN; Lembersky BC; Armitage JO; Demetri GD; Bennett CL
Am J Med; 2004 Jan; 116(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 14706663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study.
Wakabayashi C; Hayashi K; Nagai K; Sakamoto N; Iwasaki Y
BMJ Open; 2012; 2(5):. PubMed ID: 22952162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Del Valle ML; Morgenstern H; Rogstad TL; Albright C; Vickrey BG
Eval Health Prof; 1997 Dec; 20(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 10183331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of two mailing strategies on the response to a survey of physicians.
Shiono PH; Klebanoff MA
Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Sep; 134(5):539-42. PubMed ID: 1897510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of response rate and time according to the survey methods used: a randomized controlled trial.
Yi SW; Hong JS; Ohrr H; Yi JJ
Eur J Epidemiol; 2005; 20(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 15792278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey.
Baron G; De Wals P; Milord F
Eval Health Prof; 2001 Mar; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11233584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radioimmunotherapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: opinions of U.S. medical oncologists and hematologists.
Schaefer NG; Ma J; Huang P; Buchanan J; Wahl RL
J Nucl Med; 2010 Jun; 51(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 20484425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of Polycythemia Vera: A Survey of Canadian Physician Practice Patterns.
Habib LA; Kuo KHM; Panzarella T; Gupta V; Trinkaus M
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk; 2019 Jan; 19(1):e37-e42. PubMed ID: 30322792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: the American Society of Clinical Oncology survey. The Health Services Research Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Bennett CL; Smith TJ; Weeks JC; Bredt AB; Feinglass J; Fetting JH; Hillner BE; Somerfield MR; Winn RJ
J Clin Oncol; 1996 Sep; 14(9):2511-20. PubMed ID: 8823330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing financial barriers enhances the return rate of stool Hemoccult packets.
Miller MF; Wong JG
Am J Med Sci; 1993 Aug; 306(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 8362899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postal surveys versus electronic mail surveys. The tortoise and the hare revisited.
Mavis BE; Brocato JJ
Eval Health Prof; 1998 Sep; 21(3):395-408. PubMed ID: 10350958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of different monetary incentives on the return rate of a national mail survey of physicians.
VanGeest JB; Wynia MK; Cummins DS; Wilson IB
Med Care; 2001 Feb; 39(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 11176557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of mailing strategies on response rate, response time, and cost in a questionnaire study among nurses.
Choi BC; Pak AW; Purdham JT
Epidemiology; 1990 Jan; 1(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 2081243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Geographic disparities in diagnostic screening for metastatic uveal melanoma.
Gombos DS; Van Quill KR; Uusitalo M; O'Brien JM
Ophthalmology; 2004 Dec; 111(12):2254-8. PubMed ID: 15582082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
