BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11298316)

  • 1. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment.
    Palleck S; Foley TF; Hall-Scott J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 11298316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term stability of skeletal Class III patients treated with splints, Class III elastics, and chincup.
    Ferro A; Nucci LP; Ferro F; Gallo C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Apr; 123(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 12695770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the centroid method of occlusion for studying the vertical and horizontal relationship of the mandible and maxilla.
    Murata S
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 17873144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
    Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery.
    Wen-Ching Ko E; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment and post-treatment effects of facemask therapy on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class III subjects.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Mucedero M; Cozza P
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 19752018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures.
    Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of three sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class II treatment.
    Foley TF; Stirling DL; Hall-Scott J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):320-6; discussion 327-9. PubMed ID: 9294363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term skeletal and profile stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II and Class III malocclusion.
    de Lir Ade L; de Moura WL; Oliveira Ruellas AC; Gomes Souza MM; Nojima LI
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 41(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 23196069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of craniofacial growth in patients with untreated Class III malocclusions and anterior crossbites using the centroid method.
    Murata S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 19549679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Janisse FN; Bayirli B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e9-19. PubMed ID: 17208098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes of occlusal plane inclination after orthodontic treatment in different dentoskeletal frames.
    Li JL; Kau C; Wang M
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Jun; 15(1):41. PubMed ID: 25033937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
    Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Growth modulation using functional appliances--cephalometric predictors of successful response.
    Kumar SA; Shetty KS; Prakash AT
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e50-9. PubMed ID: 23646338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.