197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11298691)
1. The risk of active sensitization to PPD.
Devos SA; Van Der Valk PG
Contact Dermatitis; 2001 May; 44(5):273-5. PubMed ID: 11298691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is there a risk of active sensitization to PPD by patch testing the general population?
Thyssen JP; Menné T; Nielsen NH; Linneberg A
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 17627665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High frequency of simultaneous sensitivity to Disperse Orange 3 in patients with positive patch tests to para-phenylenediamine.
Goon AT; Gilmour NJ; Basketter DA; White IR; Rycroft RJ; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 May; 48(5):248-50. PubMed ID: 12868964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Twenty-eight-day follow-up of patch test reactions to p-phenylenediamine and p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride: A multicentre study on behalf of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Young E; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Giménez-Arnau A; Ross-Hansen K; Johansen JD; Madsen JT; Zimerson E; Svedman C
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Jul; 81(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 30684277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A 10-year review of p-phenylenediamine allergy and related para-amino compounds at the Ottawa Patch Test Clinic.
LaBerge L; Pratt M; Fong B; Gavigan G
Dermatitis; 2011; 22(6):332-4. PubMed ID: 22653006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. p-Phenylenediamine sensitization is more prevalent in central and southern European patch test centres than in Scandinavian: results from a multicentre study.
Thyssen JP; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Diepgen T; Giménez-Arnau AM; Gonçalo M; Goossens A; Le Coz C; McFadden J; Rustemeyer T; White IR; White JM; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Jun; 60(6):314-9. PubMed ID: 19489965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The concentration of para-phenylenediamine (PPD) for routine patch testing in a standard series needs to be redefined.
Becker D; Mahler V; Szliska C; Löffler H; Brasch J; Hillen U; Schnuch A; Elsner P
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Sep; 53(3):186-7. PubMed ID: 16128774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Results of Hairdressing Series Patch Test in Patients with Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Para-phenylenediamine; Are there any Safe Alternatives?
Park MY; Kim WJ; Kim HS; Kim BS; Kim MB; Ko HC
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2017 Dec; 25(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 30064608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two decades of p-phenylenediamine and toluene-2,5-diamine patch testing - focus on co-sensitizations in the European baseline series and cross-reactions with chemically related substances.
Vogel TA; Heijnen RW; Coenraads PJ; Schuttelaar MA
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Feb; 76(2):81-88. PubMed ID: 27555055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Different concentrations and volumes of p-phenylenediamine in pet. (equivalent doses) are associated with similar patch test outcomes: a pilot study.
Andersen F; Hamann CR; Andersen KE; Hamann D; Sager E; Hamann C
Contact Dermatitis; 2018 May; 78(5):335-340. PubMed ID: 29392743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is incident sensitization to p-phenylenediamine related to particular exposure patterns? Results of a questionnaire study.
Uter W; Hillen U; Geier J; ;
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 May; 56(5):266-70. PubMed ID: 17441848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Late patch test reactions: delayed immune response appears to be more common than active sensitization.
Gawkrodger DJ; Paul L
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Sep; 59(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 18759909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. p-Phenylenediamine exposure in real life - a case-control study on sensitization rate, mode and elicitation reactions in the northern Netherlands.
Vogel TA; Coenraads PJ; Bijkersma LM; Vermeulen KM; Schuttelaar ML;
Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Jun; 72(6):355-61. PubMed ID: 25824090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elicitation response characteristics to mono- and to N,N'-diacetyl-para-phenylenediamine.
Blömeke B; Pietzsch T; Merk HF
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Jun; 58(6):355-8. PubMed ID: 18503685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitization to disperse dyes in a patch test population over a five-year period.
Seidenari S; Giusti F; Massone F; Mantovani L
Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Sep; 13(3):101-7. PubMed ID: 12165928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adding p-aminoazobenzene may increase the sensitivity of the European standard series in detecting contact allergy to dyes, but carries the risk of active sensitization.
Arnold WP; van Joost T; van Der Valk PG
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Dec; 33(6):444. PubMed ID: 8706419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of patch duration on the elicitation of para-phenylenediamine contact allergy.
McFadden JP; Wakelin SH; Holloway DB; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Aug; 39(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 9746187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is PPD a useful screening agent?
Koopmans AK; Bruynzeel DP
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Feb; 48(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 12694212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-sensitizations between azo dyes and para-amino compound. A study of 236 azo-dye-sensitive subjects.
Seidenari S; Mantovani L; Manzini BM; Pignatti M
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Feb; 36(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 9062744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
