These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11298889)

  • 1. Separating different contributions to the shear force in near-field microscopy.
    Leuschner M; Schüttler M; Giessen H
    J Microsc; 2001 Apr; 202(Pt 1):176-81. PubMed ID: 11298889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibration amplitude of a tip-loaded quartz tuning fork during shear force microscopy scanning.
    Sandoz P; Friedt JM; Carry E
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Aug; 79(8):086102. PubMed ID: 19044383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tuning fork shear-force feedback.
    Ruiter AG; van der Werf KO; Veerman JA; Garcia-Parajo MF; Rensen WH; van Hulst NF
    Ultramicroscopy; 1998 Mar; 71(1-4):149-57. PubMed ID: 9566344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spectroscopy of the shear force interaction in scanning near-field optical microscopy.
    Hoppe S; Ctistis G; Paggel JJ; Fumagalli P
    Ultramicroscopy; 2005 Feb; 102(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 15639353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic behavior of tuning fork shear-force structures in a SNOM system.
    Gao F; Li X; Wang J; Fu Y
    Ultramicroscopy; 2014 Jul; 142():10-23. PubMed ID: 24815548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Angle dependence of the interaction distance in the shear force technique.
    Merlo JM; Aguilar JF; Martí-Panameño E; Cortés R; Coello V
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2011 Aug; 82(8):083704. PubMed ID: 21895248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shear force distance control in near-field optical microscopy: experimental evidence of the frictional probe-sample interaction.
    Lapshin DA; Kobylkin EE; Letokhov VS
    Ultramicroscopy; 2000 May; 83(1-2):17-23. PubMed ID: 10805389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity maximized near-field scanning optical microscope with dithering sample stage.
    Park KD; Lee SG; Heo C; Lee YH; Jeong MS
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2012 Sep; 83(9):093710. PubMed ID: 23020386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The height regulation of a near-field scanning optical microscope probe tip.
    Wang K; Wang X; Jin N; Huang W; Xu J
    J Microsc; 1999; 194(Pt 2-3):317-20. PubMed ID: 11388258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constant-distance mode scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM)--Part I: Adaptation of a non-optical shear-force-based positioning mode for SECM tips.
    Ballesteros Katemann B; Schulte A; Schuhmann W
    Chemistry; 2003 May; 9(9):2025-33. PubMed ID: 12740850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation of a short-tip tapping-mode tuning fork near-field scanning optical microscope.
    Lu NH; Huang CW; Chen CY; Yu CF; Kao TS; Fu YH; Tsai DP
    J Microsc; 2003 Mar; 209(Pt 3):205-8. PubMed ID: 12641763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Piezoelectrical shear-force distance control in near-field optical microscopy for biological applications.
    Hollricher O; Brunner R; Marti O
    Ultramicroscopy; 1998 Mar; 71(1-4):143-7. PubMed ID: 9566343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Molecular recognition imaging using tuning fork-based transverse dynamic force microscopy.
    Hofer M; Adamsmaier S; van Zanten TS; Chtcheglova LA; Manzo C; Duman M; Mayer B; Ebner A; Moertelmaier M; Kada G; Garcia-Parajo MF; Hinterdorfer P; Kienberger F
    Ultramicroscopy; 2010 May; 110(6):605-11. PubMed ID: 20226591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined scanning electrochemical/optical microscopy with shear force and current feedback.
    Lee Y; Ding Z; Bard AJ
    Anal Chem; 2002 Aug; 74(15):3634-43. PubMed ID: 12175147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tip-to-sample distance dependence of an electrostatic force in KFM measurements.
    Takahashi T; Ono S
    Ultramicroscopy; 2004 Aug; 100(3-4):287-92. PubMed ID: 15231321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The tuning fork as sensor for dynamic force distance control in scanning near-field optical microscopy.
    Naber A
    J Microsc; 1999; 194(Pt 2-3):307-10. PubMed ID: 11388256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamics of probes attached to quartz tuning forks for the detection of surface forces.
    Labardi M
    Nanotechnology; 2007 Oct; 18(39):395505. PubMed ID: 21730420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transfected single-cell imaging by scanning electrochemical optical microscopy with shear force feedback regulation.
    Takahashi Y; Shiku H; Murata T; Yasukawa T; Matsue T
    Anal Chem; 2009 Dec; 81(23):9674-81. PubMed ID: 19883061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring site-specific chemical interactions at surfaces: a case study on highly ordered pyrolytic graphite.
    Dagdeviren OE; Götzen J; Altman EI; Schwarz UD
    Nanotechnology; 2016 Dec; 27(48):485708. PubMed ID: 27811384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The qPlus sensor, a powerful core for the atomic force microscope.
    Giessibl FJ
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2019 Jan; 90(1):011101. PubMed ID: 30709191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.