These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11298912)

  • 1. Bonding agent is a decisive factor in determining the marginal leakage of dental composites subjected to thermal cycling: an in vitro study.
    Mathew M; Parameswaran Nair EK; Krishnan K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jan; 28(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 11298912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of surface sealants on marginal microleakage in Class V resin composite restorations.
    Silva Santana SV; Bombana AC; Flório FM; Basting RT
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(6):397-404. PubMed ID: 20002927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nanoleakage of cervical restorations of four dentin bonding systems.
    Li H; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 11317409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems.
    Yap AU; Ho KS; Wong KM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Sep; 25(9):666-71. PubMed ID: 9758395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations.
    Amaral CM; Hara AT; Pimenta LA; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 11806477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of Class II restorations and microtensile bond strength to dentin of low-shrinkage composites.
    Juloski J; Carrabba M; Aragoneses JM; Forner L; Vichi A; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2013 Oct; 26(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 24479279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations.
    Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Wernecke KD; Roulet JF
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):401-10. PubMed ID: 11203848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study of cavity preparation by Er:YAG laser. Effects on the marginal leakage of composite resin restoration.
    Shigetani Y; Tate Y; Okamoto A; Iwaku M; Abu-Bakr N
    Dent Mater J; 2002 Sep; 21(3):238-49. PubMed ID: 12474951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fiber-reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Watts DC; Lassila LV
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 17531311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of flowable composite resins when utilized as liners in Class II posterior composite resin restorations.
    Turner EW; Shook LW; Owens BM
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2002; 82(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 11979718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the adhesion of three restorative materials.
    Tripi TR; Bonaccorso A; Tripi V; Rapisarda E
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(6):234-9. PubMed ID: 12518497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a compomer in Class V restoration: a microleakage study.
    Tung FF; Estafan D; Scherer W
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):668-72. PubMed ID: 11203992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ability of adhesive systems to seal dentin surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Bouillaguet S; Duroux B; Ciucchi B; Sano H
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 11317393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.