116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11300216)
61. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography: evidence and potential.
Jiang Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Jun; 1(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 12622514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Evaluation of a breast cancer computer aided diagnosis system.
Frigas A; Kapsimalakou S; Spyrou G; Koufopoulos K; Vassilaros S; Chatzimichael A; Mantas J; Ligomenides P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():631-6. PubMed ID: 17108587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Segmentation algorithms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms.
Bankman IN; Nizialek T; Simon I; Gatewood OB; Weinberg IN; Brody WR
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 1997 Jun; 1(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 11020816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection.
Malich A; Schmidt S; Fischer DR; Facius M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 18337045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Downgrading BIRADS 3 to BIRADS 2 category using a computer-aided microcalcification analysis and risk assessment system for early breast cancer.
Giannakopoulou G; Spyrou GM; Antaraki A; Andreadis I; Koulocheri D; Zagouri F; Nonni A; Filippakis GM; Nikita KS; Ligomenides PA; Zografos GC
Comput Biol Med; 2010; 40(11-12):853-9. PubMed ID: 20950798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Impact on breast cancer diagnosis in a multidisciplinary unit after the incorporation of mammography digitalization and computer-aided detection systems.
Romero C; Varela C; Muñoz E; Almenar A; Pinto JM; Botella M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1492-7. PubMed ID: 22109307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Classification of mammographic masses using generalized dynamic fuzzy neural networks.
Lim WK; Er MJ
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1288-95. PubMed ID: 15191321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 17554186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Breast Microcalcification Diagnosis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network from Digital Mammograms.
Cai H; Huang Q; Rong W; Song Y; Li J; Wang J; Chen J; Li L
Comput Math Methods Med; 2019; 2019():2717454. PubMed ID: 30944574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. The use of an interactive software program for quantitative characterization of microcalcifications on digitized film-screen mammograms.
Leichter I; Lederman R; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S; Buchbinder SS
Invest Radiol; 1999 Jun; 34(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 10353031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Optimal neural network architecture selection: improvement in computerized detection of microcalcifications.
Gurcan MN; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski L; Petrick N; Helvie MA
Acad Radiol; 2002 Apr; 9(4):420-9. PubMed ID: 11942656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images.
Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Metz CE; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
Med Phys; 1991; 18(5):955-63. PubMed ID: 1961160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: false-positive marks and their reproducibility in negative mammograms.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Seong MH; Cho N; Chang JM
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):999-1004. PubMed ID: 19863409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Detection of single and clustered microcalcifications in mammograms using fractals models and neural networks.
Bocchi L; Coppini G; Nori J; Valli G
Med Eng Phys; 2004 May; 26(4):303-12. PubMed ID: 15121055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Zhang W; Doi K; Giger ML; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA
Med Phys; 1996 Apr; 23(4):595-601. PubMed ID: 8860907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. The effect of feature selection methods on computer-aided detection of masses in mammograms.
Hupse R; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2010 May; 55(10):2893-904. PubMed ID: 20427855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Extraction of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using regional watershed.
Bhajammanavar VM; Keong KC; Krishnan SM
J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):127-9. PubMed ID: 10847380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography.
Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738. PubMed ID: 28477395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. A CADx scheme for mammography empowered with topological information from clustered microcalcifications' atlases.
Andreadis II; Spyrou GM; Nikita KS
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2015 Jan; 19(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 25073178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
