These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11300262)

  • 1. Middle ear prosthesis displacement in high-strength magnetic fields.
    Williams MD; Antonelli PJ; Williams LS; Moorhead JE
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Mar; 22(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 11300262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibratory sample magnetometry of middle ear prostheses and manufacturing materials.
    Syms MJ; Peterman DW
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Jul; 22(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 11449105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety evaluation of titanium middle ear prostheses at 3.0 tesla.
    Martin AD; Driscoll CL; Wood CP; Felmlee JP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Apr; 132(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 15806041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety of MRI with metallic middle ear implants.
    Tohme SM; Karkas AA; Romanos BH
    J Med Liban; 2003; 51(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 15707072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [High field MR imaging: magnetic field interactions of aneurysm clips, coronary artery stents and iliac artery stents with a 3.0 Tesla MR system].
    Sommer T; Maintz D; Schmiedel A; Hackenbroch M; Hofer U; Urbach H; Pavlidis C; Träber F; Schild H; Höher M
    Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):731-8. PubMed ID: 15122473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ferromagnetic movements of middle ear implants and stapes prostheses in a 3-T magnetic resonance field.
    Fritsch MH; Gutt JJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Mar; 26(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 15793409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further studies on the effects of magnetic resonance imaging fields on middle ear implants.
    Applebaum EL; Valvassori GE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1990 Oct; 99(10 Pt 1):801-4. PubMed ID: 2221737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of stapes prostheses.
    Syms MJ
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Mar; 115(3):381-90. PubMed ID: 15744146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Metallic middle-ear implants in magnetic resonance tomography: hearing impairment and other hazards].
    Hüttenbrink KB
    Radiologe; 1987 Aug; 27(8):377-9. PubMed ID: 3659346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavior of metal implants used in ENT surgery in 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.
    Thelen A; Bauknecht HC; Asbach P; Schrom T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Oct; 263(10):900-5. PubMed ID: 16835741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety of intrauterine devices in MRI.
    Bussmann S; Luechinger R; Froehlich JM; von Weymarn C; Reischauer C; Koh DM; Gutzeit A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204220. PubMed ID: 30300364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings: assessment of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 Tesla.
    Shellock FG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2001; 3(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 11777223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [How do metallic middle ear implants behave in the MRI?].
    Kwok P; Waldeck A; Strutz J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2003 Jan; 82(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12548459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MRI Safety of Stapes Prostheses: A Systematic Review.
    Daher GS; Kocharyan A; Carlson ML; Dillon WP; Fischbein NJ; Jackler R; Rassner U; Gurgel RK
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jun; 45(5):469-474. PubMed ID: 38518765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic properties of middle ear and stapes implants in a 9.4-T magnetic resonance field.
    Fritsch MH; Gutt JJ; Naumann IC
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1064-9. PubMed ID: 16988620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of MRI safety issues for stainless steel sutures used for microtia reconstruction.
    Kraai TL; Loch RB; Shellock FG
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Oct; 71(10):1469-1475. PubMed ID: 30007538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of magnetic field (4.7 T) induced forces on prosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings.
    Edwards MB; Ordidge RJ; Hand JW; Taylor KM; Young IR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Aug; 22(2):311-7. PubMed ID: 16028239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance imaging of stapes prostheses.
    Syms AJ; Petermann GW
    Am J Otol; 2000 Jul; 21(4):494-8. PubMed ID: 10912693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of mechanical deformation on magnetic properties and MRI artifacts of type 304 and type 316L stainless steel.
    Bendel LP; Shellock FG; Steckel M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(6):1170-3. PubMed ID: 9400866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MRI issues for ballistic objects: information obtained at 1.5-, 3- and 7-Tesla.
    Dedini RD; Karacozoff AM; Shellock FG; Xu D; McClellan RT; Pekmezci M
    Spine J; 2013 Jul; 13(7):815-22. PubMed ID: 23562330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.