These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11300572)

  • 1. Chronic and temporary distinct expectancies as comparison standards: automatic contrast in dispositional judgments.
    Weary G; Tobin SJ; Reich DA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Mar; 80(3):365-80. PubMed ID: 11300572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An on-line look at automatic contrast and correction of behavior categorizations and dispositional inferences.
    Tobin SJ; Weary G
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1328-38. PubMed ID: 15189592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When expectancy meets desire: motivational effects in reconstructive memory.
    McDonald HE; Hirt ER
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1997 Jan; 72(1):5-23. PubMed ID: 9008371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Depressives' future-event schemas and the social inference process.
    Reich DA; Weary G
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1998 May; 74(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 9599435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How automatic are social judgments?
    Winter L; Uleman JS; Cunniff C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1985 Oct; 49(4):904-17. PubMed ID: 4057049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Need for cognition, task difficulty, and the formation of performance expectancies.
    Reinhard MA; Dickhäuser O
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 May; 96(5):1062-76. PubMed ID: 19379036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age differences in the correspondence bias: when a plausible explanation matters.
    Blanchard-Fields F; Horhota M
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2005 Sep; 60(5):P259-67. PubMed ID: 16131620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceiving individuals and groups: expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions.
    Susskind J; Maurer K; Thakkar V; Hamilton DL; Sherman JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1999 Feb; 76(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 10074704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trait expectancies and stereotype expectancies affect person memory similarly in a jury context.
    Scherer CR; Heider JD; Skowronski JJ; Edlund JE
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(5):613-22. PubMed ID: 22930999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disconfirmation of person expectations by older and younger adults: implications for social vigilance.
    Ybarra O; Park DC
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2002 Sep; 57(5):P435-43. PubMed ID: 12198102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unintended effects of goals on unintended inferences.
    Uleman JS; Moskowitz GB
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1994 Mar; 66(3):490-501. PubMed ID: 8169761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assimilative behavior identification can also be resource dependent: the unimodel perspective on personal-attribution phases.
    Chun WY; Spiegel S; Kruglanski AW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Sep; 83(3):542-55. PubMed ID: 12219853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cultural differences in the correction of social inferences: Does the dispositional rebound occur in an interdependent culture?
    Geeraert N; Yzerbyt VY
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2007 Jun; 46(Pt 2):423-35. PubMed ID: 17565790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The dispositional inference strikes back: situational focus and dispositional suppression in causal attribution.
    Yzerbyt VY; Corneille O; Dumont M; Hahn K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Sep; 81(3):365-76. PubMed ID: 11554640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Busy perceivers and ineffective suppression goals: a critical role for distracter thoughts.
    Reich DA; Mather RD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 34(5):706-18. PubMed ID: 18319378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting responsibility judgments from dispositional inferences and causal attributions.
    Langenhoff AF; Wiegmann A; Halpern JY; Tenenbaum JB; Gerstenberg T
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Sep; 129():101412. PubMed ID: 34303092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive models of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Earnst KS; Marson DC; Harrell LE
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 Aug; 48(8):919-27. PubMed ID: 10968295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of mood during exposure to target information on subsequently reported judgments: an on-line model of misattribution and correction.
    Ottati VC; Isbell LM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Jul; 71(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 8709001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dispositional individual differences in cognitive effort investment: establishing the core construct.
    Kührt C; Pannasch S; Kiebel SJ; Strobel A
    BMC Psychol; 2021 Jan; 9(1):10. PubMed ID: 33482925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporating if...then...personality signatures in person perception: beyond the person-situation dichotomy.
    Kammrath LK; Mendoza-Denton R; Mischel W
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Apr; 88(4):605-18. PubMed ID: 15796663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.