276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11301645)
21. Critics seek changes in nursing home survey.
Eubanks P
Hospitals; 1989 Feb; 63(3):68. PubMed ID: 2912864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. S.D. nursing homes in outcomes project.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 1996 Jun; 26(25):24, 30. PubMed ID: 10157998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Quality care is key to survey success.
Siclari PM
Provider; 1991 Jul; 17(7):14-6, 19-20, 23. PubMed ID: 10114252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Perspectives. Nursing homes: quality concerns reappear.
Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1987 Sep; 41(38):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10284654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. HCFA releases revised survey protocols, guidance to surveyors.
LTC Regul Risk Liabil Advis; 2001 Apr; 9(8):7-8. PubMed ID: 11345892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. No pain, all gain. The new nursing home consumer quality measures present several challenges to today's long-term care facilities. Is yours ready?
Clark TR
Contemp Longterm Care; 2003 Feb; 26(2):40, 42. PubMed ID: 12669605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Quality-care rules.
Gebhardt RB
Nurs Homes; 1986; 35(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 10284028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Linking data and quality in the age of computers.
Wagner L
Provider; 1996 Mar; 22(3):44-5, 47-8, 51-2 passim. PubMed ID: 10156734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Internet ratings: data without context.
Burgess KL
Provider; 2003 Apr; 29(4):39-41. PubMed ID: 12708248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The American Association of Homes for the Aging.
Hurley HJ
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1991; 36():4. PubMed ID: 1930583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Survey process gets a total makeover.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 Feb; 18(2):21. PubMed ID: 10140129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Truce called in Calif. nursing home war.
Wagner L
Mod Healthc; 1991 Mar; 21(11):17. PubMed ID: 10109635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Sometimes it pays to appeal survey findings.
Foltz-Gray D
Contemp Longterm Care; 1998 Feb; 21(2):69. PubMed ID: 10177553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. HCFA proposes modifications to verification of compliance policy.
LTC Regul Risk Liabil Advis; 2001 Mar; 9(6):1, 5-6. PubMed ID: 11302012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. HCFA defends its record to ensure quality of care.
Weiss HP
Contemp Longterm Care; 1986 Nov; 9(11):17-20, 118, 121. PubMed ID: 10281245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. ACHA comments on IOM's report.
Capistrant G
Provider; 1986 Jul; 12(7):36-41. PubMed ID: 10300893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Nursing home reform: the battle continues.
Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1986 Nov; 40(44):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10279420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Measuring the needs of the Medicare population.
Halm BJ
Healthc Exec; 1998; 13(5):50-1. PubMed ID: 10186208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing family satisfaction with care for persons with dementia.
Wakefield B; Buckwalter KC; Collins CE
Balance; 1997 Jul; 1(1):16-7, 40-2. PubMed ID: 10180820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Sorry marks for nursing homes.
Findlay S
US News World Rep; 1988 Dec; 105(23):92-3. PubMed ID: 10291064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
