These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11301976)

  • 1. [Quality assured images in mammographic screening. Assessment criteria as a basis for national guidelines].
    Ståhl M; Edström C
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Mar; 98(10):1097-101. PubMed ID: 11301976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer: when and how often to get screened. How do you make sense of conflicting mammography guidelines?
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2013 Oct; 21(2):3. PubMed ID: 24432454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do the latest breast cancer screening recommendations affect you?
    Health After 50 Sci Am Consum Health; 2016 Feb; 27(15):4-5. PubMed ID: 27062757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and implementation of a quality assurance program for mammography.
    de Paredes ES; Frazier AB; Hartwell GD; Strash AM; Scheer C; Smith DC; Barnette PA; Noel W; Kenneweg D
    Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 3823463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland.
    Fabiszewska E; Grabska I; Jankowska K; Wesolowska E; Bulski W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):206-9. PubMed ID: 21824870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assurance in mammography. Accreditation, legislation, and compliance with quality assurance standards.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 1732931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Breast cancer screening: a current topic].
    Gilles R; Dilhuydy M
    J Radiol; 2001 Jun; 82(6 Pt 1):619-20. PubMed ID: 11449163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Mammographic screening fulfills the requirements of health control].
    Sandelin K
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Mar; 96(9):983-4. PubMed ID: 10093435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening mammography and the "r" word.
    Truog RD
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Dec; 361(26):2501-3. PubMed ID: 19940292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [National mammography screening--how far are we?].
    Vejborg I
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2010 Mar; 172(12):947. PubMed ID: 20334781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The controversy of mammography screening.
    Kopans DB
    Adm Radiol; 1995 Jan; 14(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10141106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current issues in mammographic breast cancer screening.
    Rickard MT
    Hosp Med; 1999 May; 60(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 10396406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer screening. Interpreting new data for clinical practice.
    Daly L
    Physician Assist; 1994 Oct; 18(10):47-51, 56, 61-6. PubMed ID: 10138304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assurance in Trent Regional Health Authority's breast screening programme.
    Thornhill P
    Radiogr Today; 1990 Apr; 56(635):11-3. PubMed ID: 2363814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of mammography equipment in the Macedonian breast screening campaign 2008/2009.
    Gershan V; Antevska-Grujoska S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):187-91. PubMed ID: 21733866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Good reasons to implement quality assurance in nationwide breast cancer screening programs in Croatia and Serbia: results from a pilot study.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O; Faj D; Stimac D; Kosutic D; Arandjic D; Brkic H
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 19896314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confrontation of mammography systems in flanders with the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in mammography screening. Analysis of initial results.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Deprez T; Rogge F; Van Steen A; Van Limbergen E; Marchal G
    JBR-BTR; 1999 Dec; 82(6):288-93. PubMed ID: 10670170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How the USPSTF's Mammographic Screening Guidelines Should Be Interpreted.
    Prasad V
    Am J Med; 2017 Jul; 130(7):769-770. PubMed ID: 28344145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [European recommendations for quality assurance in the setting of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Report of pathologists of the working group "Breast Cancer Screening" of the European Union].
    Ann Pathol; 1996 Nov; 16(5):315-33. PubMed ID: 9004719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.