146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11302093)
1. Ethical perspectives in evaluation of telehealth.
Cornford T; Klecun-Dabrowska E
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2001; 10(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 11302093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Home-based telemedicine: a survey of ethical issues.
Bauer KA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2001; 10(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 11302090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Basic concepts and fundamental issues in technology assessment.
Franklin C
Intensive Care Med; 1993; 19(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 8486866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Health technology assessment in its local contexts: studies of telehealthcare.
May C; Mort M; Williams T; Mair F; Gask L
Soc Sci Med; 2003 Aug; 57(4):697-710. PubMed ID: 12821017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Telemedicine system evaluation and a collaborative model for multi-centered research.
Perednia DA
J Med Syst; 1995 Jun; 19(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 7643025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IQWiG methods--a response to two critiques.
Caro JJ; Nord E; Siebert U; McGuire A; McGregor M; Henry D; de Pouvourville G; Atella V; Kolominsky-Rabas P
Health Econ; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1137-8. PubMed ID: 20842681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of technical evaluation in telemedicine systems.
Clarke M; Thiyagarajan CA
Telemed J E Health; 2008 Mar; 14(2):170-83. PubMed ID: 18361707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Some essential clarifications: IQWiG comments on two critiques of the efficiency frontier approach.
Dintsios CM; Gerber A
Health Econ; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1139-41. PubMed ID: 20842682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sins of omission and obfuscation: IQWIG's guidelines on economic evaluation methods.
Sculpher M; Claxton K
Health Econ; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1132-6. PubMed ID: 20662107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficiency frontier approach to economic evaluation: will it help German policy making?
Brouwer WB; Rutten FF
Health Econ; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1128-31. PubMed ID: 20641141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical issues in technology assessment. Conceptual categories and procedural considerations.
Heitman E
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1998; 14(3):544-66. PubMed ID: 9780541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer Rx: more harm than good?
Wall R
J Med Syst; 1991 Dec; 15(5-6):321-34. PubMed ID: 1812185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving information systems in Europe: EURETHNET.
Fangerau H; Simon A; Wiesemann C
Med Health Care Philos; 2003; 6(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 12710566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Telemedicine: a proposal for an ethical code.
Iserson KV
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2000; 9(3):404-6. PubMed ID: 10858890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup report on Methodology. Methodological guidance for the conduct of health technology assessment.
Liberati A; Sheldon TA; Banta HD
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1997; 13(2):186-219. PubMed ID: 9194352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Model for Assessment of Telemedicine (MAST): A scoping review of empirical studies.
Kidholm K; Clemensen J; Caffery LJ; Smith AC
J Telemed Telecare; 2017 Oct; 23(9):803-813. PubMed ID: 28758525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The evaluation of telemedicine and health services research.
Grigsby J; Brega AG; Devore PA
Telemed J E Health; 2005 Jun; 11(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 16035929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Technology assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis: misguided guidelines?
Naylor CD; Williams JI; Basinski A; Goel V
CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):921-4. PubMed ID: 8448706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Telemedicine and medical technology assessment].
Myhre KI
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Aug; 120(19):2312-4. PubMed ID: 10997095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations revisited.
Laupacis A; Feeny D; Detsky AS; Tugwell PX
CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):927-9. PubMed ID: 8448707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
