154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11302096)
1. Autonomy, benevolence, and Alzheimer's disease.
Sailors PR
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2001; 10(2):184-93. PubMed ID: 11302096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hypothetical autonomy and actual autonomy: some problem cases involving advance directives.
Wreen MJ
J Clin Ethics; 2004; 15(4):319-33. PubMed ID: 15830561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Alzheimer disease and the "then" self.
Post SG
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Dec; 5(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10172542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ethics of autonomy and dignity in long-term care.
Pullman D
Can J Aging; 1999; 18(1):26-46. PubMed ID: 11658186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Precedent autonomy and personal identity.
Quante M
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1999 Dec; 9(4):365-81. PubMed ID: 11657917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bound to freedom: the Ulysses contract and the psychiatric will.
Macklin A
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1987; 45(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11659143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Justified paternalism: the nature of beneficence in the care of dementia patients.
Groves K
Penn Bioeth J; 2006; 2(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 17146904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Precedent autonomy: life-sustaining intervention and the demented patient.
Newton MJ
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1999; 8(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 10067190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protecting autonomy as authenticity using Ulysses contracts.
van Willigenburg T; Delaere P
J Med Philos; 2005 Aug; 30(4):395-409. PubMed ID: 16029989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Autonomy, liberalism and advance care planning.
Ikonomidis S; Singer PA
J Med Ethics; 1999 Dec; 25(6):522-7. PubMed ID: 10635509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advance directives in psychiatry. Resolving issues of autonomy and competence.
Ritchie J; Sklar R; Steiner W
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(3):245-60. PubMed ID: 9717088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ulysses contracts.
Lavin M
J Appl Philos; 1986 Mar; 3(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 11658829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective autonomy and critical interests: a narrative defense of the moral authority of advance directives.
Rich BA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1997; 6(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 9179408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. When capacity fades and autonomy is constricted: a client-centered approach to residential care.
Hofland BF
Generations; 1994; 18(4):31-5. PubMed ID: 11657013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Balancing autonomy with paternalism for psychiatric patients? Ambiguities in personal choice and adcance directivesments [sic].
Sass HM
Taiwan Yi Xue Ren Wen Xue Kan; 2001 Oct; 2(1-2):18-28. PubMed ID: 15011652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The duty to care--the right to refuse. Changing roles of patients and physicians in end-of-life decision making.
Garwin M
J Leg Med; 1998 Mar; 19(1):99-125. PubMed ID: 9564096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Respecting the margins of agency: Alzheimer's patients and the capacity to value.
Jaworska A
Philos Public Aff; 1999; 28(2):105-38. PubMed ID: 11657616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Some reflections on the problem of advance directives, personhood, and personal identity.
Kuhse H
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1999 Dec; 9(4):347-64. PubMed ID: 11657916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Precommitment: a misguided strategy for securing death with dignity.
Dresser R
Tex Law Rev; 2003 Jun; 81(7):1823-47. PubMed ID: 15478265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The moral underpinning of the proxy-provider relationship: issues of trust and distrust.
Collopy BJ
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 11657141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
