134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11303776)
1. How the mass counts: an electrophysiological approach to the processing of lexical features.
Steinhauer K; Pancheva R; Newman AJ; Gennari S; Ullman MT
Neuroreport; 2001 Apr; 12(5):999-1005. PubMed ID: 11303776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The syntactic and semantic processing of mass and count nouns: an ERP study.
Chiarelli V; El Yagoubi R; Mondini S; Bisiacchi P; Semenza C
PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e25885. PubMed ID: 21998715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
Hagoort P
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrophysiological signatures of event words: Dissociating syntactic and semantic category effects in lexical processing.
Lapinskaya N; Uzomah U; Bedny M; Lau E
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):151-157. PubMed ID: 27794431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction.
Gunter TC; Friederici AD; Schriefers H
J Cogn Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 12(4):556-68. PubMed ID: 10936910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When Chinese semantics meets failed syntax.
Yu J; Zhang Y
Neuroreport; 2008 May; 19(7):745-9. PubMed ID: 18418250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Brain responses to agreement violations of Chinese grammatical aspect.
Zhang Y; Zhang J
Neuroreport; 2008 Jul; 19(10):1039-43. PubMed ID: 18580575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Semantic memory and verbal working memory correlates of N400 to subordinate homographs.
Salisbury DF
Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):396-9. PubMed ID: 15177821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: an event-related potential study.
Angrilli A; Penolazzi B; Vespignani F; De Vincenzi M; Job R; Ciccarelli L; Palomba D; Stegagno L
Neurosci Lett; 2002 Mar; 322(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11958830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An ERP study of syntactic processing in English and nonsense sentences.
Yamada Y; Neville HJ
Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1130(1):167-80. PubMed ID: 17173867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When syntax meets semantics.
Gunter TC; Stowe LA; Mulder G
Psychophysiology; 1997 Nov; 34(6):660-76. PubMed ID: 9401421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrophysiological comparison of grammatical processing and semantic processing of single spoken nouns.
Thierry G; Cardebat D; Démonet JF
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 17(3):535-47. PubMed ID: 14561443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recognition of morphologically complex words in Finnish: evidence from event-related potentials.
Lehtonen M; Cunillera T; Rodríguez-Fornells A; Hultén A; Tuomainen J; Laine M
Brain Res; 2007 May; 1148():123-37. PubMed ID: 17382308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Event-related potential responses to metric violations: rules versus meaning.
Rothermich K; Schmidt-Kassow M; Schwartze M; Kotz SA
Neuroreport; 2010 Jun; 21(8):580-4. PubMed ID: 20431495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese.
Zhang Y; Yu J; Boland JE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):765-81. PubMed ID: 20438271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain potentials to inflected adjectives: beyond storage and decomposition.
Leminen A; Clahsen H
Brain Res; 2014 Jan; 1543():223-34. PubMed ID: 24161829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
Ye Z; Zhan W; Zhou X
Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1142():135-45. PubMed ID: 17303093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Melodic pitch expectation interacts with neural responses to syntactic but not semantic violations.
Carrus E; Pearce MT; Bhattacharya J
Cortex; 2013 Sep; 49(8):2186-200. PubMed ID: 23141867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Syntactic and referential processes in second-language learners: event-related brain potential evidence.
Isel F
Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1885-9. PubMed ID: 18007180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrophysiological evidence for reversed lexical repetition effects in language processing.
Swaab TY; Camblin CC; Gordon PC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 16(5):715-26. PubMed ID: 15200700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
