These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11304017)

  • 1. Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search.
    Gibson BS; Jiang Y
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jan; 63(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 11304017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Search of jumping items: visual marking and discrete motion.
    Olds ES; McMurtry CM
    Perception; 2003; 32(4):449-62. PubMed ID: 12785483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual marking: a convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search.
    Atchley P; Jones SE; Hoffman L
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):667-77. PubMed ID: 12956576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is "marked" in visual marking? Evidence for effects of configuration in preview search.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ; Hulleman J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Aug; 65(6):982-96. PubMed ID: 14528904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What kind of memory supports visual marking?
    Jiang Y; Wang SW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 14769069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The preview benefit in single-feature and conjunction search: Constraints of visual marking.
    Meinhardt G; Persike M
    J Vis; 2015; 15(13):13. PubMed ID: 26382004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finding an emotional face in a crowd: emotional and perceptual stimulus factors influence visual search efficiency.
    Lundqvist D; Bruce N; Öhman A
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(4):621-33. PubMed ID: 24933527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual marking: the effects of irrelevant changes on preview search.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Apr; 67(3):418-34. PubMed ID: 16119391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Competition between color salience and perceptual load during visual selection can be biased by top-down set.
    Biggs AT; Gibson BS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 20045879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal Binding and Segmentation in Visual Search: A Computational Neuroscience Analysis.
    Mavritsaki E; Humphreys G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1553-67. PubMed ID: 27243617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: a time course analysis of visual marking using behavioural and functional imaging procedures.
    Humphreys GW; Kyllingsbaek S; Watson DG; Olivers CN; Law I; Paulson OB
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 May; 57(4):610-35. PubMed ID: 15204126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking.
    Yamauchi K; Kawahara JI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():200-211. PubMed ID: 30530171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the preattentive accessibility of stereoscopic disparity: evidence from visual search.
    O'Toole AJ; Walker CL
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):202-18. PubMed ID: 9055616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual search deficits in Parkinson's disease are attenuated by bottom-up target salience and top-down information.
    Horowitz TS; Choi WY; Horvitz JC; Côté LJ; Mangels JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1962-77. PubMed ID: 16580700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extinction-like effects in normals: independence of localization and response selection.
    Pollmann S
    Brain Cogn; 2000 Dec; 44(3):324-41. PubMed ID: 11104529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search.
    Humphreys GW; Stalmann BJ; Olivers C
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jul; 66(5):713-30. PubMed ID: 15495898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distractors less salient than targets capture attention rather than producing non-spatial filtering costs.
    Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 23747508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.
    Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Yoon EY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 16417687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual marking in moving displays: feature-based inhibition is not necessary.
    Watson DG
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jan; 63(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 11304018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marking rejected distractors: a gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search.
    Dickinson CA; Zelinsky GJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Dec; 12(6):1120-6. PubMed ID: 16615338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.