108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11304700)
21. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
Stomper PC; Gelman RS
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency in breast malignancy between cone beam breast CT and mammography in dense breast].
Liu AD; Ma Y; Yin L; Han P; Li HJ; Ye ZX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 40(8):604-609. PubMed ID: 30139031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women.
Yu X; Hu G; Zhang Z; Qiu F; Shao X; Wang X; Zhan H; Chen Y; Deng Y; Huang J
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():450. PubMed ID: 27401536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic imaging in symptomatic breast patients: team and individual performance.
Britton P; Warwick J; Wallis MG; O'Keeffe S; Taylor K; Sinnatamby R; Barter S; Gaskarth M; Duffy SW; Wishart GC
Br J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 85(1012):415-22. PubMed ID: 21224304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Abraham LA; Lehman CD; Yankaskas BC; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Voeks JH; Geller BM; Carney PA; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 15734926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design.
Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH
Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Lower sensitivity of screening mammography after previous benign breast surgery.
van Breest Smallenburg V; Duijm LE; Voogd AC; Groenewoud JH; Jansen FH; van Beek M; Louwman MW
Int J Cancer; 2012 Jan; 130(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 21328339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Incremental diagnostic value of quantitative analysis of double phase Tc-99m MIBI scintimammography for the detection of primary breast cancer additive to visual analysis.
Kim SJ; Kim IJ; Bae YT; Kim YK; Kim DS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jan; 83(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 14997043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast disease: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Ying X; Lin Y; Xia X; Hu B; Zhu Z; He P
Breast J; 2012; 18(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 22356352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Besnard PE; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Peterse H; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Muller SH; Meijer S; Oosterwijk JC; Beex LV; Tollenaar RA; de Koning HJ; Rutgers EJ; Klijn JG;
N Engl J Med; 2004 Jul; 351(5):427-37. PubMed ID: 15282350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer.
Stoutjesdijk MJ; Boetes C; Jager GJ; Beex L; Bult P; Hendriks JH; Laheij RJ; Massuger L; van Die LE; Wobbes T; Barentsz JO
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Jul; 93(14):1095-102. PubMed ID: 11459871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Breast ultrasound in office gynecology--ten years of experience.
Lenz S
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S3-7. PubMed ID: 20938894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prediction of the usefulness of combined mammography and scintimammography in suspected primary breast cancer using ROC curves.
Buscombe JR; Cwikla JB; Holloway B; Hilson AJ
J Nucl Med; 2001 Jan; 42(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 11197976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. (99)mTc-3PRGD2 scintimammography in palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions.
Liu L; Song Y; Gao S; Ji T; Zhang H; Ji B; Chen B; Jia B; Wang F; Xu Z; Ma Q
Mol Imaging; 2014; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 24825112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography.
Cole EB; Toledano AY; Lundqvist M; Pisano ED
Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):916-22. PubMed ID: 22537503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Using (18)F-FLT PET to distinguish between malignant and benign breast lesions with suspicious findings in mammography and breast ultrasound.
Wang J; Kuo WH; Shih TT; Yen RF
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Dec; 28(10):941-9. PubMed ID: 25139471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improved detection rate of early breast cancer in mass screening combined with mammography.
Ohuchi N; Yoshida K; Kimura M; Ouchi A; Kamioki S; Shiiba K; Matoba N; Kojima S; Takahashi K; Matsuno S
Jpn J Cancer Res; 1993 Jul; 84(7):807-12. PubMed ID: 8396569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
