These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11305546)

  • 1. Hysterectomy prevalence and adjusted cervical and uterine cancer rates in England and Wales.
    Redburn JC; Murphy MF
    BJOG; 2001 Apr; 108(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 11305546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hysterectomy rates and their influence upon mortality from carcinoma of the cervix.
    Alderson M; Donnan S
    J Epidemiol Community Health (1978); 1978 Sep; 32(3):175-7. PubMed ID: 711975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hysterectomy and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and screening coverage in Denmark.
    Lam JU; Lynge E; Njor SH; Rebolj M
    Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(8):1136-43. PubMed ID: 25800858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Historical and projected hysterectomy rates in the USA: Implications for future observed cervical cancer rates and evaluating prevention interventions.
    Simms KT; Yuill S; Killen J; Smith MA; Kulasingam S; de Kok IMCM; van Ballegooijen M; Burger EA; Regan C; Kim JJ; Canfell K
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Sep; 158(3):710-718. PubMed ID: 32723676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of hysterectomy on the age-specific incidence of cervical and uterine cancer in Germany and other countries.
    Stang A
    Eur J Public Health; 2013 Oct; 23(5):879-83. PubMed ID: 22711786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of adjusting for hysterectomy prevalence on cervical cancer incidence rates and trends among women aged 30 years or older-United States, 2001-2019.
    Gopalani SV; Sawaya GF; Rositch AF; Dasari S; Thompson TD; Mix JM; Saraiya M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Aug; 193(8):1097-1105. PubMed ID: 38583940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated.
    Herbert A
    Cytopathology; 2000 Dec; 11(6):471-9. PubMed ID: 11194078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy prevalence on rates of cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancer among American Indian and Alaska Native women, 1999-2004.
    Wong CA; Jim MA; King J; Tom-Orme L; Henderson JA; Saraiya M; Richardson LC; Layne L; Suryaprasad A; Espey DK
    Cancer Causes Control; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1681-9. PubMed ID: 21984306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gestational trophoblastic disease in the Asian population of Northern England and North Wales.
    Tham BW; Everard JE; Tidy JA; Drew D; Hancock BW
    BJOG; 2003 Jun; 110(6):555-9. PubMed ID: 12798471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. State-level uterine corpus cancer incidence rates corrected for hysterectomy prevalence, 2004 to 2008.
    Siegel RL; Devesa SS; Cokkinides V; Ma J; Jemal A
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Jan; 22(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 23125334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trends in incidence of and mortality from invasive cancer of the uterine cervix in Scotland (1975-1994).
    Walker JJ; Brewster D; Gould A; Raab GM
    Public Health; 1998 Nov; 112(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 9883033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk-adjusted cancer-incidence rates (United States).
    Merrill RM; Feuer EJ
    Cancer Causes Control; 1996 Sep; 7(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 8877053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The temporal and age-dependent patterns of hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer incidence rates in Denmark: a population-based cohort study.
    Hammer A; Kahlert J; Rositch A; Pedersen L; Gravitt P; Blaakaer J; Soegaard M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 27861705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Declining hysterectomy prevalence and the estimated impact on uterine cancer incidence in Scotland.
    Ruiz de Azua Unzurrunzaga G; Brewster DH; Wild SH; Sivalingam VN
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 59():227-231. PubMed ID: 30836220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hysterectomy-corrected incidence rates of cervical and uterine cancers in Massachusetts, 1995 to 2010.
    Stang A; Hawk H; Knowlton R; Gershman ST; Kuss O
    Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 24(11):849-54. PubMed ID: 25241148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increased age and race-specific incidence of cervical cancer after correction for hysterectomy prevalence in the United States from 2000 to 2009.
    Rositch AF; Nowak RG; Gravitt PE
    Cancer; 2014 Jul; 120(13):2032-8. PubMed ID: 24821088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The incidence and prevalence of AIDS and prevalence of other severe HIV disease in England and Wales for 1995 to 1999: projections using data to the end of 1994.
    Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev; 1996 Jan; 6(1):R1-21. PubMed ID: 8581117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tuberculosis at the end of the 20th century in England and Wales: results of a national survey in 1998.
    Rose AM; Watson JM; Graham C; Nunn AJ; Drobniewski F; Ormerod LP; Darbyshire JH; Leese J;
    Thorax; 2001 Mar; 56(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 11182007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pap smear utilization in Canada: estimates after adjusting the eligible population for hysterectomy status.
    Snider JA; Beauvais JE
    Chronic Dis Can; 1998; 19(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 9550731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cancer of the body of the uterus: trends in mortality and incidence in England, 1985-2008.
    Duncan ME; Seagroatt V; Goldacre MJ
    BJOG; 2012 Feb; 119(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 22082282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.