These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11306874)

  • 1. Surgery for stress incontinence: a non-randomised trial of colposuspension, needle suspension and anterior colporrhaphy.
    Hutchings A; Black NA
    Eur Urol; 2001 Apr; 39(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 11306874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Five-year results after anti-incontinence operations.
    Tamussino KF; Zivkovic F; Pieber D; Moser F; Haas J; Ralph G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Dec; 181(6):1347-52. PubMed ID: 10601911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review.
    Lapitan MC; Cody JD; Grant A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(6):472-80. PubMed ID: 19591206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial.
    Carey MP; Goh JT; Rosamilia A; Cornish A; Gordon I; Hawthorne G; Maher CF; Dwyer PL; Moran P; Gilmour DT
    BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):999-1006. PubMed ID: 16956331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative outcome analysis of laparoscopic colposuspension, abdominal colposuspension and vaginal needle suspension for female urinary incontinence.
    Das S
    J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):368-71. PubMed ID: 9679879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 25-year experience with 519 anterior colporrhaphy procedures.
    Beck RP; McCormick S; Nordstrom L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 78(6):1011-8. PubMed ID: 1945199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgery for stress incontinence: factors associated with a successful outcome.
    Hutchings A; Griffiths J; Black NA
    Br J Urol; 1998 Nov; 82(5):634-41. PubMed ID: 9839576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomised comparison of Burch colposuspension versus anterior colporrhaphy in women with stress urinary incontinence and anterior vaginal wall prolapse.
    Duckett JR; Connell R
    BJOG; 2000 Aug; 107(8):1060. PubMed ID: 10955448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Laparoscopic transperitoneal colposuspension modo Burch in stress incontinence in women. A comparison of early and late results].
    Huk J; Fryczkowski M
    Przegl Lek; 2002; 59(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 12152257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.
    Lemack GE; Krauss S; Litman H; FitzGerald MP; Chai T; Nager C; Sirls L; Zyczynski H; Baker J; Lloyd K; Steers WD;
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2076-80. PubMed ID: 18804239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The Barnett-Macku method of anterior colporrhaphy in the prevention and treatment of urinary stress incontinence in women with cystocele].
    Chmel R; Vlk R; Rob L; Horcicka L
    Ceska Gynekol; 2003 Jan; 68(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 12708109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What determines the choice of procedure in stress incontinence surgery? The use of multilevel modeling.
    Griffiths JM; Black NA; Pope C; Stanley J; Bowling A; Abel PD
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1998; 14(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 9780530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension--results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.
    Kitchener HC; Dunn G; Lawton V; Reid F; Nelson L; Smith AR;
    BJOG; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1007-13. PubMed ID: 16956332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence of recurrent cystocele after anterior colporrhaphy with and without concomitant transvaginal needle suspension.
    Kohli N; Sze EH; Roat TW; Karram MM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 175(6):1476-80; discussion 1480-2. PubMed ID: 8987928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
    Albo ME; Richter HE; Brubaker L; Norton P; Kraus SR; Zimmern PE; Chai TC; Zyczynski H; Diokno AC; Tennstedt S; Nager C; Lloyd LK; FitzGerald M; Lemack GE; Johnson HW; Leng W; Mallett V; Stoddard AM; Menefee S; Varner RE; Kenton K; Moalli P; Sirls L; Dandreo KJ; Kusek JW; Nyberg LM; Steers W;
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2143-55. PubMed ID: 17517855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for primary female stress incontinence.
    Valpas A; Rissanen P; Kujansuu E; Nilsson CG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1485-90. PubMed ID: 17260226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: which one should we choose?
    Reid F; Smith AR
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 17625416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Burch colposuspension].
    Almeida M; Colaço J; Santos Pereira H; Vieira A; Gonçalves V; Retto H; Meirinho M
    Acta Med Port; 2004; 17(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 15636723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical correction of female urinary incontinence: comparison of colporrhaphy, sling and suspension procedures.
    Yumru AE; Dinçgez Çakmak B; Öndeş B; Ergez M
    J Int Med Res; 2012; 40(5):1942-8. PubMed ID: 23342394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.
    Ankardal M; Ekerydh A; Crafoord K; Milsom I; Stjerndahl JH; Engh ME
    BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):974-81. PubMed ID: 15327613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.