These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11307206)
1. Cleaning efficacy of a new root canal irrigation solution: a preliminary evaluation. Marais JT Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 11307206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cleaning effectiveness of root canal irrigation with electrochemically activated anolyte and catholyte solutions: a pilot study. Solovyeva AM; Dummer PM Int Endod J; 2000 Nov; 33(6):494-504. PubMed ID: 11307252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of oxidative potential water as a root canal irrigant. Hata G; Hayami S; Weine FS; Toda T Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):308-17. PubMed ID: 11482143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser. Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K Int Endod J; 1999 Jan; 32(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 10356467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file. Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of smear layer removal by EDTAC and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic agitation. Guerisoli DM; Marchesan MA; Walmsley AD; Lumley PJ; Pecora JD Int Endod J; 2002 May; 35(5):418-21. PubMed ID: 12059911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigating solutions: a comparative scanning electron microscope evaluation. Ahir B; Parekh V; Katyayan MK; Katyayan PA Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 25511062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate and its effect on root dentin. Bui TB; Baumgartner JC; Mitchell JC J Endod; 2008 Feb; 34(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 18215677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ex vivo analysis of root canal cleaning using Endo-PTC associated to NaOCl and different irrigant solutions. Yamazaki AK; Moura-Netto C; Salgado RJ; Kleine BM; Prokopowitsch I Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 20339708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of calcium hydroxide and four irrigation regimens on instrumented and uninstrumented canal wall topography. Tatsuta CT; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC; Adey JD J Endod; 1999 Feb; 25(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 10204464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of various root canal irrigants on removal of smear layer in the primary root canals after hand instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopy study. Hariharan VS; Nandlal B; Srilatha KT J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 21273715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study. Metzger Z; Teperovich E; Cohen R; Zary R; Paqué F; Hülsmann M J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 20307746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the cytotoxic effects and smear layer removing capacity of oxidative potential water, NaOCl and EDTA. Serper A; Calt S; Dogan AL; Guc D; Ozçelik B; Kuraner T J Oral Sci; 2001 Dec; 43(4):233-8. PubMed ID: 11848188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study. Kamel WH; Kataia EM J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant. Kaya S; Yiğit-Özer S; Adigüzel Ö Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bacterial eradication from root dentine by ultrasonic irrigation with sodium hypochlorite. Huque J; Kota K; Yamaga M; Iwaku M; Hoshino E Int Endod J; 1998 Jul; 31(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 9823113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of Smear Layer on the Antimicrobial Activity of a Sodium Hypochlorite/Etidronic Acid Irrigating Solution in Infected Dentin. Morago A; Ordinola-Zapata R; Ferrer-Luque CM; Baca P; Ruiz-Linares M; Arias-Moliz MT J Endod; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1647-1650. PubMed ID: 27616541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cleaning efficacy and dentin micro-hardness after root canal irrigation with a strong acid electrolytic water. Qing Y; Akita Y; Kawano S; Kawazu S; Yoshida T; Sekine I J Endod; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1102-6. PubMed ID: 17055917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the effect of four final irrigation protocols on root canal dentin components by polarized light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Baldasso FER; Cardoso LR; Silva VDD; Morgental RD; Kopper PMP Microsc Res Tech; 2017 Dec; 80(12):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 28925588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]