142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11307233)
1. Use of hydroxyapatite cement to support implants in extraction sockets.
Lew D; Rubey T; Krizan K; Keller JC
Implant Dent; 2000; 9(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 11307233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical-radiographic and histological evaluation of two hydroxyapatites in human extraction sockets: a pilot study.
Checchi V; Savarino L; Montevecchi M; Felice P; Checchi L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 40(5):526-32. PubMed ID: 21282040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite at immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Caneva M; Botticelli D; Stellini E; Souza SL; Salata LA; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 21143533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of guided bone regeneration and grafting on implants placed into immediate extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs.
Kohal RJ; Mellas P; Hürzeler MB; Trejo PM; Morrison E; Caffesse RG
J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 9736376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of biomaterial implants in the dental socket: histological analysis in dogs.
Santos FA; Pochapski MT; Martins MC; Zenóbio EG; Spolidoro LC; Marcantonio E
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18783409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dental implants placed in extraction sites grafted with different bone substitutes: radiographic evaluation at 24 months.
Crespi R; Capparè P; Gherlone E
J Periodontol; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1616-21. PubMed ID: 19792851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite and porcine bone in human extraction socket healing: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation.
Crespi R; Capparè P; Gherlone E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1057-62. PubMed ID: 22010090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. BoneSource for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.
Turk JB; Parhiscar A
Facial Plast Surg; 2000; 16(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 11802350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hard tissue formation adjacent to implants of various size and configuration immediately placed into extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs.
Caneva M; Salata LA; de Souza SS; Bressan E; Botticelli D; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):885-90. PubMed ID: 20491839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alveolar bone regeneration for immediate implant placement using an injectable bone substitute: an experimental study in dogs.
Boix D; Gauthier O; Guicheux J; Pilet P; Weiss P; Grimandi G; Daculsi G
J Periodontol; 2004 May; 75(5):663-71. PubMed ID: 15212348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resolution of surgically created three-wall intrabony defects in implants using three different biomaterials: an in vivo study.
Choi JY; Jung UW; Lee IS; Kim CS; Lee YK; Choi SH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 20831755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets: 2. Histochemical observations at 9 months.
Artzi Z; Tal H; Dayan D
J Periodontol; 2001 Feb; 72(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 11288787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Collagen membranes at immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Caneva M; Botticelli D; Salata LA; Scombatti Souza SL; Carvalho Cardoso L; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):891-7. PubMed ID: 20497441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dimensional ridge alterations following socket preservation using a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite paste: a histomorphometrical study in dogs.
Rothamel D; Schwarz F; Herten M; Engelhardt E; Donath K; Kuehn P; Becker J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(8):741-7. PubMed ID: 18554868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repair of craniofacial defects with hydroxyapatite cement.
Lew D; Farrell B; Bardach J; Keller J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Dec; 55(12):1441-9; discussion 1449-51. PubMed ID: 9393404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Four-year follow-up of larger-diameter implants placed in fresh extraction sockets using a resorbable membrane or a resorbable alloplastic material.
Prosper L; Gherlone EF; Redaelli S; Quaranta M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):856-64. PubMed ID: 14696661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Healing of ungrafted and grafted extraction sockets after 12 weeks: a prospective clinical study.
Heberer S; Al-Chawaf B; Jablonski C; Nelson JJ; Lage H; Nelson K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 21483892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bio-Oss(®) for delayed osseointegration of implants in dogs: a histological study.
Liu HY; Zheng H; Hou XP; Zhong WJ; Ying XX; Chai SL; Ma GW
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 52(8):729-34. PubMed ID: 25060973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in dogs.
Karabuda C; Sandalli P; Yalcin S; Steflik DE; Parr GR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 10453665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
