These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
681 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11307252)
21. Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal. Guo X; Miao H; Li L; Zhang S; Zhou D; Lu Y; Wu L BMC Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 14():114. PubMed ID: 25201549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation. Salman MI; Baumann MA; Hellmich M; Roggendorf MJ; Termaat S Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 20518928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cleaning efficacy of a new root canal irrigation solution: a preliminary evaluation. Marais JT Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 11307206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope. Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation. Pérez-Heredia M; Ferrer-Luque CM; González-Rodríguez MP J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):993-7. PubMed ID: 16982281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Smear layer production by 3 rotary reamers with different cutting blade designs in straight root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study. Jeon IS; Spångberg LS; Yoon TC; Kazemi RB; Kum KY Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Nov; 96(5):601-7. PubMed ID: 14600696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study. Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigating solutions: a comparative scanning electron microscope evaluation. Ahir B; Parekh V; Katyayan MK; Katyayan PA Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 25511062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study. Kamel WH; Kataia EM J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of canal cleanliness and smear layer removal after the use of the Quantec-E irrigation system and syringe: a comparative scanning electron microscope study. Setlock J; Fayad MI; BeGole E; Bruzick M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Nov; 96(5):614-7. PubMed ID: 14600698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of size and taper of basic root canal preparation on root canal cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopy study. Plotino G; Özyürek T; Grande NM; Gündoğar M Int Endod J; 2019 Mar; 52(3):343-351. PubMed ID: 30129186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A scanning electron microscopy evaluation of different root canal irrigating solutions. de la Casa ML; Raiden G Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2005; 18(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 16673793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the smear layer removal and erosive capacity of EDTA, boric acid, citric acid and desy clean solutions: an in vitro study. Turk T; Kaval ME; Şen BH BMC Oral Health; 2015 Sep; 15():104. PubMed ID: 26335205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. Torabinejad M; Khademi AA; Babagoli J; Cho Y; Johnson WB; Bozhilov K; Kim J; Shabahang S J Endod; 2003 Mar; 29(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12669874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of different sonic activation protocols on debridement efficacy in teeth with single-rooted canals. Niu LN; Luo XJ; Li GH; Bortoluzzi EA; Mao J; Chen JH; Gutmann JL; Pashley DH; Tay FR J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1001-9. PubMed ID: 24878251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of different irrigation protocols on smear layer removal in root canals of primary teeth: a SEM study. Demirel A; Yüksel BN; Ziya M; Gümüş H; Doğan S; Sari Ş Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):380-385. PubMed ID: 30859897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cleaning efficiency of anatomic endodontic technology, ProFile System and Manual Instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an in vitro study. Reddy ES; Sainath D; Narenderreddy M; Pasari S; Vallikanthan S; Sindhurareddy G J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 24309340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals. Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of root canal taper on its cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopic study. Arvaniti IS; Khabbaz MG J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):871-4. PubMed ID: 21787508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]