These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11307474)

  • 1. Effect of eugenol-containing sealer on marginal adaptation of dentine-bonded resin fillings.
    Peters O; Göhring TN; Lutz F
    Int Endod J; 2000 Jan; 33(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 11307474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaptation of an etch-and-rinse adhesive with a new type of solvent in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Trumm C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Dec; 14(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 19937075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Spahr A; Schön F; Haller B
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites.
    Campos EA; Ardu S; Lefever D; Jassé FF; Bortolotto T; Krejci I
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 24561041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of ZOE temporary restorations on microleakage in composite restorations.
    Yap AU; Shah KC; Loh ET; Sim SS; Tan CC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 11933904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Roulet J
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 10856804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proximo-cervical adaptation of Class II-composite restorations after thermocycling: a quantitative and qualitative study.
    Schuckar M; Geurtsen W
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct; 24(10):766-75. PubMed ID: 9372468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of finishing time on the marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified resin composite.
    Lim CC; Neo J; Yap A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jan; 26(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 10080324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of tetric ceram/excite and Ariston pHc/Ariston liner.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):309-13. PubMed ID: 11803996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The competition between enamel and dentin adhesion within a cavity: an in vitro evaluation of class V restorations.
    Bortolotto T; Doudou W; Kunzelmann KH; Krejci I
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1125-35. PubMed ID: 22015462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.