380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11309341)
21. Prognostic potential of DNA flow cytometry measurements in node-negative breast cancer patients: preliminary analysis of an intergroup study (INT 0076).
Dressler LG; Eudey L; Gray R; Tormey DC; McGuire WL; Gilchrist KW; Clark GM; Osborne CK; Mansour EG; Abeloff MD
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1992; (11):167-72. PubMed ID: 1627424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prognostic value of S-phase fraction in lymph-node-negative breast cancer by image and flow cytometric analysis.
Peiró G; Lerma E; Climent MA; Seguí MA; Alonso MC; Prat J
Mod Pathol; 1997 Mar; 10(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 9071729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Standardization and quality control in the evaluation of proliferation parameters in T1T2, N0N1, M0 breast cancer: multicentric retrospective study II. DNA-ploidy and S-phase fraction].
Chassevent A; Jourdan ML; Ferrero-Poüs M; Colonna M; Romain S; Spyratos F; Roth H; Bolla M
Bull Cancer; 1999; 86(7-8):685-91. PubMed ID: 10477386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy using flow cytometry in 1301 breast cancer patients: results of the prospective Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project.
Bergers E; Baak JP; van Diest PJ; Willig AJ; Los J; Peterse JL; Ruitenberg HM; Schapers RF; Somsen JG; van Beek MW; Bellot SM; Fijnheer J; van Gorp LH
Mod Pathol; 1997 Aug; 10(8):762-8. PubMed ID: 9267817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in stage I endometrial carcinoma.
Pfisterer J; Kommoss F; Sauerbrei W; Rendl I; Kiechle M; Kleine W; Pfleiderer A
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 58(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 7622098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prognostic markers in node-negative breast cancer: a prospective study.
Kute TE; Russell GB; Zbieranski N; Long R; Johnston S; Williams H; Stackhouse C; Wilkins L; Evans I; Berry P; Rimmer K; Tucker E
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2004 May; 59(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 15108167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Survival of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma: importance of prognostic markers of the primary tumor.
Chang J; Clark GM; Allred DC; Mohsin S; Chamness G; Elledge RM
Cancer; 2003 Feb; 97(3):545-53. PubMed ID: 12548595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Flow cytometric S-phase fraction as a complementary biological parameter for the cytological grading of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Pinto AE; Cabeçadas J; Nóbrega SD; Mendonça E
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Oct; 29(4):194-9. PubMed ID: 14506670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Breast cancer: prognostic value of flow cytometry and hormone receptors. Apropos of a Lebanese series of patients].
Aftimos G; Trak-Smayra V; Moacdieh-Rehayel L
J Med Liban; 2000; 48(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 10881437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Flow cytometry detected S-phase fraction and ploidy as prognostic parameters in primary, node-negative breast cancer].
Winter K; Eidtmann H; Jonat W
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 May; 54(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 8050690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. DNA analysis and S-phase fraction determination by flow cytometric analysis of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast.
Frost AR; Karcher DS; Terahata S; Siegel RS; Silverberg SG
Mod Pathol; 1996 Sep; 9(9):930-7. PubMed ID: 8878026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cell cycle analysis of 932 flow cytometric DNA histograms of fresh frozen breast carcinoma material. Correlations between flow cytometric, clinical, and pathologic variables. MMMCP Collaborative Group. Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project Collaborative Group.
Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP
Cancer; 1996 Jun; 77(11):2258-66. PubMed ID: 8635093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Predictive value of flow cytometry for metastatic potential in breast cancer.
Schmidt H; Wei JP; Yeh KA
Am Surg; 1999 May; 65(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 10231212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Flow cytometry in primary breast carcinomas: prognostic impact of multiploidy and hypoploidy.
Michels JJ; Duigou F; Marnay J; Denoux Y; Delozier T; Chasle J
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2003 Sep; 55(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 12949958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. DNA ploidy and survival in breast cancer patients.
Cornelisse CJ; van de Velde CJ; Caspers RJ; Moolenaar AJ; Hermans J
Cytometry; 1987 Mar; 8(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 3582068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prediction of relapse or survival in patients with node-negative breast cancer by DNA flow cytometry.
Clark GM; Dressler LG; Owens MA; Pounds G; Oldaker T; McGuire WL
N Engl J Med; 1989 Mar; 320(10):627-33. PubMed ID: 2918874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prognostic value of S-phase fraction in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and nodal negative breast carcinomas.
Fietkau R; Iro H; Tulusan AH; Dressel V; Altendorf-Hofmann A; Sauer R
Strahlenther Onkol; 1994 Jan; 170(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 8303573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Image cytometric DNA analysis in human breast cancer analysis may add prognostic information in diploid cases with low S-phase fraction by flow cytometry.
Baldetorp B; Fernö M; Fallenius A; Fallenius-Vecchi G; Idvall I; Olsson H; Sigurdsson H; Akerman M; Killander D
Cytometry; 1992; 13(6):577-85. PubMed ID: 1451590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Metaphase cytogenetics and DNA flow cytometry with analysis of S-phase fraction in prostate cancer: influence on prognosis.
Bratt O; Anderson H; Bak-Jensen E; Baldetorp B; Lundgren R
Urology; 1996 Feb; 47(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 8607238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mitosin (a new proliferation marker) correlates with clinical outcome in node-negative breast cancer.
Clark GM; Allred DC; Hilsenbeck SG; Chamness GC; Osborne CK; Jones D; Lee WH
Cancer Res; 1997 Dec; 57(24):5505-8. PubMed ID: 9407959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
