BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11309687)

  • 1. A confidence-set approach for finding tightly linked genomic regions.
    Lin S; Rogers JA; Hsu JC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1219-28. PubMed ID: 11309687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data.
    Douglas JA; Boehnke M; Lange K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1287-97. PubMed ID: 10739757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Replication of linkage studies of complex traits: an examination of variation in location estimates.
    Roberts SB; MacLean CJ; Neale MC; Eaves LJ; Kendler KS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Sep; 65(3):876-84. PubMed ID: 10441592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs.
    Cordell HJ; Wedig GC; Jacobs KB; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1273-86. PubMed ID: 10729111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A two-stage variable-stringency semiparametric method for mapping quantitative-trait loci with the use of genomewide-scan data on sib pairs.
    Ghosh S; Majumder PP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Mar; 66(3):1046-61. PubMed ID: 10712217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of transmission-ratio distortion on allele sharing in affected sibling pairs.
    Greenwood CM; Morgan K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jun; 66(6):2001-4. PubMed ID: 10775526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mapping of complex traits by single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Zhao LP; Aragaki C; Hsu L; Quiaoit F
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Jul; 63(1):225-40. PubMed ID: 9634510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regression models for linkage heterogeneity applied to familial prostate cancer.
    Schaid DJ; McDonnell SK; Thibodeau SN
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1189-96. PubMed ID: 11309684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transformation of sib-pair values for the Haseman-Elston method.
    Wang D; Lin S; Cheng R; Gao X; Wright FA
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1238-49. PubMed ID: 11309688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs.
    Leal SM; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):567-75. PubMed ID: 10677317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. LODVIEW: a computer program for the graphical evaluation of lod score results in exclusion mapping of human disease genes.
    Hildebrandt F; Pohlmann A; Omran H
    Comput Biomed Res; 1993 Dec; 26(6):592-9. PubMed ID: 8112059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1298-309. PubMed ID: 10731467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equivalence of single- and multilocus markers: power to detect linkage with composite markers derived from biallelic loci.
    Wilson AF; Sorant AJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1610-5. PubMed ID: 10762546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power comparison of parametric and nonparametric linkage tests in small pedigrees.
    Sham PC; Lin MW; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1661-8. PubMed ID: 10762550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linkage analysis of genetic disorders.
    Taylor EW; Xu J; Jabs EW; Meyers DA
    Methods Mol Biol; 1997; 68():11-25. PubMed ID: 9055247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scan statistics to scan markers for susceptibility genes.
    Hoh J; Ott J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2000 Aug; 97(17):9615-7. PubMed ID: 10931953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HLODs remain powerful tools for detection of linkage in the presence of genetic heterogeneity.
    Hodge SE; Vieland VJ; Greenberg DA
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):556-9. PubMed ID: 11791217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the assessment of statistical significance in disease-gene discovery.
    Zhao LP; Prentice R; Shen F; Hsu L
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Jun; 64(6):1739-53. PubMed ID: 10330362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multipoint linkage analysis of the pseudoautosomal regions, using affected sibling pairs.
    Dupuis J; Van Eerdewegh P
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Aug; 67(2):462-75. PubMed ID: 10869236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.